Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815840›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2016

[Analgesia in intensive care medicine].

J R Ortlepp, F Luethje, R Walz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J R OrtleppKlinik für Innere Medizin und Intensivmedizin, Asklepios Kliniken Schildautal, Karl-Herold-Str. 1, 38723, Seesen, Deutschland. j.ortlepp@asklepios.com.
F LuethjeInternistische Intensivstation, Klinik für Innere Medizin und Intensivmedizin, Asklepios Kliniken Schildautal, Seesen, Deutschland.
R WalzKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe administration of sedatives and analgesics on the intensive care unit (ICU) is routine daily practice. The correct discrimination between delirium, pain and anxiety or confusion is essential for the strategy and selection of medication. The correct pain therapy and sedation are essential for patient quality of life on the ICU and for the prognosis.

objectiveThe aim of this article is to present state of the art recommendations on the classification of pain and pain therapy on the ICU. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn online search was carried out in PubMed for publications on the topics of "pain" and "ICU".

resultsCritical care patients are frequently subjected to many procedures and situations which can cause pain. The perception of pain is, among other things, influenced by the degree of orientation, anxiety and the degree of sedation. The administration of analgesics and non-pharmacological approaches are effective in reducing the stress perceived by patients. DISCUSSION: The main aim is improvement in the awareness of nursing and medical personnel for pain inducers and pain perception in ICU patients. The classification of pain must be made objectively. Therapeutic targets must be defined and in addition to the correct selection of pain medication, non-pharmacological approaches must also be consistently implemented.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnxietyCritical CareDeliriumDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPainPain MeasurementAnalgesicsAnxietyDeliriumPain measurementPain treatment, non-pharmcological

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.