ArticleJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN
Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Nobody Told Me": A Qualitative Study of Sexual and Reproductive Concerns After Treatment for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2026Article
- Breaking the Silence: Barriers to Fertility Preservation Among Young Breast Cancer Patients in Ghana - a multicenter study.Research square · 2025Article
- Prospective survey exploring decision-making among patients pursuing oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy: Seeking certainty or harboring hope?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Decisions of young women with breast cancer regarding fertility preservation before cancer treatment and family building after treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Fertility Concerns Related to Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: An Under-Discussed Topic.Cancers · 2024Review
- Perspectives and needs for fertility preservation decision-making in childbearing-age patients with breast cancer: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Review
- Parental perspective on the risk of infertility and fertility preservation options for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease considering hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2023Article
- Identification of Psychological Profiles of Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation Counseling.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Factors Associated With a High Motivation to Undergo Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence-based informational resources.Cancer medicine · 2020Review
- Psychological Aspects Associated With Fertility Preservation in Oncology: An Exploratory Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Applying behavioral theory to understand fertility consultation uptake after cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2019Article
- Patients' preimplantation genetic testing decision-making experience: an opinion on related psychological frameworks.Human reproduction open · 2019Article
- The intersection of financial toxicity and family building in young adult cancer survivors.Cancer · 2018Article
- Fertility Counseling for Transgender AYAs.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2018Article
- Oncofertility: Fertile Ground for Conflict Between Patient Autonomy and Medical Values.The oncologist · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo understand young women's reasons for accepting or declining fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis to aid in the development of theory regarding decision making in this context.
designQualitative descriptive.
settingParticipants' homes or other private location.
participantsTwenty-seven young women (mean age, 29 years) diagnosed with cancer and eligible for fertility preservation.
methodsRecruitment was conducted via the Internet and in fertility centers. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Tenets of grounded theory guided an inductive and deductive analysis.
resultsYoung women's reasons for deciding whether to undergo fertility preservation were linked to four theoretical dimensions: Cognitive Appraisals, Emotional Responses, Moral Judgments, and Decision Partners. Women who declined fertility preservation described more reasons in the Cognitive Appraisals dimension, including financial cost and human risks, than women who accepted. In the Emotional Responses dimension, most women who accepted fertility preservation reported a strong desire for biological motherhood, whereas women who declined tended to report a strong desire for surviving cancer. Three participants who declined reported reasons linked to the Moral Judgments dimension, and most participants were influenced by Decision Partners, including husbands, boyfriends, parents, and clinicians.
conclusionThe primary reason on which many but not all participants based decisions related to fertility preservation was whether the immediate emphasis of care should be placed on surviving cancer or securing options for future biological motherhood. Nurses and other clinicians should base education and counseling on the four theoretical dimensions to effectively support young women with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.