ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2011
The treatment of traumatic shock: recent advances and unresolved questions.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Older age and post-traumatic organ failure a TraumaRegister DGUEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Postinjury multiple organ failure in polytrauma: more frequent and potentially less deadly with less crystalloid.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Should we change our approach to resuscitating victims of femoral fracture? A clinical experience in a busy trauma hospital in Shiraz, Iran.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2021Article
- The challenges and advances of polytrauma care in 2012.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncontrolled bleeding remains a leading cause of potentially preventable death after trauma. Timely, adequate resuscitation in traumatic shock is an essential, lifesaving aspect of polytrauma care. Whilst basic principles in the treatment of traumatic shock remain the same-achieving hemorrhage control and replacing lost volume, the way this is achieved has changed significantly in the last five years. The abandonment of blood pressure driven uncontrolled fluid resuscitation, the introduction of the concept of hemostatic resuscitation, and the increasing use of massive transfusion protocols have all contributed to an improvement in timely access to various blood products. The increase in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of trauma, the availability of adjuncts, and the array of resuscitation monitoring options available have all contributed to a potentially improved approach to resuscitation. The purpose of this report is to review the most important advances in traumatic shock therapy in the last five years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.