Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815451›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2013

Distinguishing between acute appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele: is this possible preoperatively?

B Saylam, C E Güldoğan, F Coşkun, V Vural, B Çomçalı, M Tez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B SaylamDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. mdbsaylam@yahoo.com.
C E GüldoğanDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. drguldogan@gmail.com.
F CoşkunDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. farukcoskun@mynet.com.
V VuralDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. velivural1980@hotmail.com.
B ÇomçalıDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. bulentcomcali@hotmail.com.
M TezDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. mesuttez@yahoo.com.
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMucocele of the appendix is an infrequent event, characterized by a cystic dilatation of the lumen. It is often diagnosed clinically from signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis or, if it is asymptomatic, as an incidental finding during ultrasonography, computed tomography, or laparotomy.

methodsWe evaluated the histological data of patients who were believed to have mucocele of the appendix. These patients (n = 23) were compared with sex- and age-matched control subjects (n = 79) with appendicitis.

resultsThe main reason for emergency surgery was lower right abdominal pain in 15 patients, and intestinal obstruction in three. Univariate analysis using sonography demonstrated that the larger appendiceal outer diameter was positively correlated with the diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele (p = 0.001) and the mean white blood cell count was negatively correlated (p = 0.023). In urine analysis, 41.7 % of the mucocele patients and 10 % of the appendicitis patients had microscopic hematuria, respectively (p = 0.019). An outer diameter of 10 mm or more was predictive of appendiceal mucocele diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 76.5 %, specificity of 81 %, positive predictive value of 76.5 %, and negative predictive value of 94.12 %. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 80.2 %. One point was given for the presence of each of these factors to develop a new score. The resulting area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.855 (95 % CI 0.741-0.969) for the score. The histological examination of the specimens revealed mucocele in 15 cases, mucinous cystadenoma in seven cases and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in one case. Twenty patients underwent appendectomy, and three patients were treated with right colectomy.

conclusionsA threshold 10-mm diameter of the appendix under compression is a useful preoperative measurement for differentiating between appendiceal mucocele and acute appendicitis. Microhematuria is simple test that can provide a significant role in supporting the clinical diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele in the emergency department.

Indexed as

AppendicitisMicrohematuriaMucocele of the appendixScore

Identifiers

PMID26815451
OpenAlexW2110943577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.