Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815450›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2013

Does ATLS trauma training fit into Western countries: evaluation of the first 8 years of ATLS in Germany.

M Muenzberg, T Paffrath, G Matthes, L Mahlke, B Swartman, M Hoffman, R Lefering, C G Wölfl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Current trauma care system and trauma care training in China.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M MuenzbergDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
T PaffrathDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
G MatthesDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Berlin, Warener Straße 7, 12683, Berlinv, Germany.
L MahlkeDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, St. Vincenz Hospital Paderborn, Am Busdorf 2, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
B SwartmanDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
M HoffmanInstitution for Didactics and Education Sciences in Health Care, University Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
R LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, Haus 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
C G WölflDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany. christoph.woelfl@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith over 2 million certified physicians worldwide, the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program is one of the most successful international medical education programs. Germany joined the ATLS program in 2003. Before implementation of the program, there was a controversial discussion as to whether a country like Germany with a long history of trauma care needed ATLS at all. 197 courses with nearly 3,000 providers were performed until December 2010.

aimWe assessed the course evaluations since the implementation of ATLS in Germany using the participants' systematic feedback.

methodDuring the course, each participant evaluated each presentation, skill station, and simulation on a rating scale from 1 to 4 (1 being the best, 4 being the worst). The participants completed the evaluation forms during the course and before they received their results. The course coordinator made sure that all forms were returned. The feedback forms were collected anonymously and were entered into a database. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and mean values.

resultsThe cumulative evaluation of all courses revealed an average performance score of 1.39 (1.06-1.86; n = 197). The lectures, skill stations, and simulations were individually evaluated as follows: lectures 1.61 (1.00-2.81; n = 197), skill stations 1.40 (1.00-2.40; n = 197), and surgical skill stations 1.35 (1.00-2.38; n = 197). Practical skills simulation (case scenarios) received the highest grade of 1.24 (1.00-1.57; n = 197). There were no significant changes during the time concerning the results of the evaluation.

conclusionThe overall assessment showed constantly good and excellent evaluations by the participants over the years. In general, skill stations and simulations performed better than lectures. According to these results, the course format is well accepted by the participants and, therefore, can be recommended to all physicians treating trauma patients. Our results also underline the value of such a course format in an industrial country with an already established trauma system.

Indexed as

ATLSGolden hourPolytraumaTrauma managementTrauma training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.