Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815360›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2016

Separate and joint effects of alcohol and caffeine on conflict monitoring and adaptation.

Kira Bailey, Michael T Amlung, David H Morris, Mason H Price, Curtis Von Gunten, Denis M McCarthy, Bruce D Bartholow

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kira BaileyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Michael T AmlungDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
David H MorrisDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Mason H PriceDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Curtis Von GuntenDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Denis M McCarthyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. mccarthydm@missouri.edu.
Bruce D BartholowDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. bartholowb@missouri.edu.

Funding

Psychology of Alcohol Use and Dependence TrainingT32AA013526 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DENIS M MCCARTHY, KENNETH JAMES SHER · 2002 to 2026
$9.0M
Resource CoreP60AA011998 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN · 2009 to 2013
$8.8M
Motivated Attention: Effects of Alcohol Advertising on Youth DrinkingR01AA020970 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI BARTHOLOW, BRUCE D · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA011998NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020970NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA013526NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA013526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCaffeine is commonly believed to offset the acute effects of alcohol, but some evidence suggests that cognitive processes remain impaired when caffeine and alcohol are coadministered.

objectivesNo previous study has investigated the separate and joint effects of alcohol and caffeine on conflict monitoring and adaptation, processes thought to be critical for self-regulation. This was the purpose of the current study.

methodsHealthy, young adult social drinkers recruited from the community completed a flanker task after consuming one of four beverages in a 2 × 2 experimental design: Alcohol + caffeine, alcohol + placebo caffeine, placebo alcohol + caffeine, or placebo alcohol + placebo caffeine. Accuracy, response time, and the amplitude of the N2 component of the event-related potential (ERP), a neural index of conflict monitoring, were examined as a function of whether or not conflict was present (i.e., whether or not flankers were compatible with the target) on both the previous trial and the current trial.

resultsAlcohol did not abolish conflict monitoring or adaptation. Caffeine eliminated conflict adaptation in sequential trials but also enhanced neural conflict monitoring. The combined effect of alcohol and caffeine was apparent only in how previous conflict affected the neural conflict monitoring response.

conclusionsTogether, the findings suggest that caffeine leads to exaggeration of attentional resource utilization, which could provide short-term benefits but lead to problems conserving resources for when they are most needed.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalSocial AdjustmentAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingAttentionCaffeineElectroencephalographyEthanolEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultCaffeineEthanolAlcohol and caffeineCognitive controlConflict adaptationConflict monitoringERPsEvent-related potentials

Identifiers

PMID26815360
PMCPMC4803583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.