Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26814458›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB

Effect of 10% fluoride on the remineralization of dentin in situ.

Mozhgan Bizhang, Sabine Kaleta-Kragt, Preeti Singh-Hüsgen, Markus Jörg Altenburger, Stefan Zimmer

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mozhgan BizhangDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Sabine Kaleta-KragtDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Preeti Singh-HüsgenDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry and Periodontics, Heinrich-Hein University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Markus Jörg AltenburgerDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefan ZimmerDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this randomized, cross-over, in situ study was to determine the remineralization of demineralized dentin specimens after the application of a 10% fluoride (F-) or a 1% chlorhexidine-1% thymol (CHX-thymol) varnish. Material and Methods Twelve individuals without current caries activity wore removable appliances in the lower jaw for a period of four weeks. Each appliance contained four human demineralized dentin specimens fixed on the buccal aspects. The dentin specimens were obtained from the cervical regions of extracted human third molars. After demineralization, half the surface of each specimen was covered with a nail varnish to serve as the reference surface. The dentin specimens were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: F-, CHX-thymol, and control (no treatment). Before the first treatment period and between the others, there were washout periods of one week. After each treatment phase, the changes in mineral content (vol% µm) and the lesion depths (µm) of the dentin slabs were determined by transverse microradiography (TMR). Data analysis was accomplished by the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.05). Results The medians (25th/75th percentile) of integrated mineral loss were 312.70 (203.0-628.7) for chlorhexidine varnish, 309.5 (109.8-665.8) for fluoride varnish, and -346.9 (-128.7 - -596.0) for the control group. The medians (25th/75th percentile) of lesion depth were 13.6 (5.7-34.5) for chlorhexidine varnish, 16.5 (5.6-38.1) for fluoride varnish, and -14.2 (-4.5- -32.9) for the control group. Use of the 10% F- or 1% CHX-1% thymol varnishes resulted in significantly decreased mineral loss and lesion depth in dentin when compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant differences among the test groups. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the effect of the treatment of demineralized dentin with 10% F- or 1% CHX-1% thymol is better than without any treatment.

Indexed as

AdultCariostatic AgentsChlorhexidineDentinDrug CombinationsFemaleFluorides, TopicalHumansMaleMicroradiographyReference ValuesStatistics, NonparametricSurface PropertiesThymolTime FactorsTooth DemineralizationCariostatic AgentsChlorhexidinechlorhexidine, thymol drug combinationDrug CombinationsFluorides, TopicalThymol

Identifiers

PMID26814458
PMCPMC4716694
OpenAlexW2272752228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.