Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26814032›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Global metagenomic survey reveals a new bacterial candidate phylum in geothermal springs.

Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh, David Paez-Espino, Jessica Jarett, Peter F Dunfield, Brian P Hedlund, Anne E Dekas, Stephen E Grasby, Allyson L Brady, Hailiang Dong, Brandon R Briggs and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Emiley A Eloe-FadroshDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
David Paez-EspinoDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Jessica JarettDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Peter F DunfieldDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Brian P HedlundSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA.
Anne E DekasLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA.
Stephen E GrasbyGeological Survey of Canada, Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7, Canada.
Allyson L BradySchool of Geography &Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada.
Hailiang DongDepartment of Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA.
Brandon R BriggsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska-Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska 99508, USA.
Wen-Jun LiSchool of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Danielle GoudeauDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Rex MalmstromDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Amrita PatiDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Jennifer Pett-RidgeLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA.
Edward M RubinDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Tanja WoykeDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Nikos C KyrpidesDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Natalia N IvanovaDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of the increasing wealth of metagenomic data collected from diverse environments can lead to the discovery of novel branches on the tree of life. Here we analyse 5.2 Tb of metagenomic data collected globally to discover a novel bacterial phylum ('Candidatus Kryptonia') found exclusively in high-temperature pH-neutral geothermal springs. This lineage had remained hidden as a taxonomic 'blind spot' because of mismatches in the primers commonly used for ribosomal gene surveys. Genome reconstruction from metagenomic data combined with single-cell genomics results in several high-quality genomes representing four genera from the new phylum. Metabolic reconstruction indicates a heterotrophic lifestyle with conspicuous nutritional deficiencies, suggesting the need for metabolic complementarity with other microbes. Co-occurrence patterns identifies a number of putative partners, including an uncultured Armatimonadetes lineage. The discovery of Kryptonia within previously studied geothermal springs underscores the importance of globally sampled metagenomic data in detection of microbial novelty, and highlights the extraordinary diversity of microbial life still awaiting discovery.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialHot SpringsHot TemperatureMetagenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26814032
PMCPMC4737851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.