Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26813761›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2016

A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops.

Sanwen Huang, Detlef Weigel, Roger N Beachy, Jiayang Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. UnderstandingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Identification and Characterization of the MIKC-Type MADS-Box Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Classification of CRISPR/Cas system and its application in tomato breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanwen HuangAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-5309
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Roger N BeachyWorld Food Center at the University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Jiayang LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-6574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedCrops, AgriculturalGenetic Engineering

Identifiers

PMID26813761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.