ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2016
Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transfer of cognitive control adjustments within and between speakers.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- Impact of aging on crossmodal attention switching.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Binding of response-independent task rules.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects?Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Rethinking attentional reset: Task sets determine the boundaries of adaptive control.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022Article
- Processing time not modality dominates shift costs in the modality-shifting effect.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Monitoring and control in multitasking.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Review
- Attentional Reorientation and Inhibition Adjustment in a Verbal Stroop Task: A Lifespan Approach to Interference and Sequential Congruency Effect.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Effector system-specific sequential modulations of congruency effects.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduced congruency effects after a preceding incongruent trial suggest a conflict-monitoring process, which reactively triggers the recruitment of attentional control in subsequent trials. In the present study, we assessed this sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects separately in two different tasks. Participants performed a location judgment task and a numerical judgment task in a block-wise fashion in a modality-switching paradigm. Stimuli were presented simultaneously in two modalities and were either congruent or incongruent (e.g., left visual object, right sound) with each other. The target modality was indicated by a cue, so that the target modalities either repeated or switched in successive trials. For both tasks, the results indicated reduced congruency effects after an incongruent trial only for modality repetitions, but not for switches. This finding suggests that modality switches induce a shift in episodic context, which in turn leads to an attentional reset. This reset eliminates the sequential modulation of congruency effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26813694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.