ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2016
[Gynecological cancers in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk of gynecological cancers in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases only seems to be elevated with respect to cervical cancer and mainly in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. There is increasing evidence for an influence of the immune system on tumor control of gynecological malignancies; however, an adverse influence of immunosuppressive treatment in rheumatic patients was indicated only for the risk of cervical cancer. In contrast, biologics could not be shown to cause an increased risk of cervical cancer but data on this topic are limited. General screening recommendations exist for breast cancer and cervical cancer. Recommendations for follow-up after oncological treatment are presented. Because of limited evidence immunosuppressive and biological treatment should be applied with great restraint at least within the first 5 years after curative oncological treatment also for gynecological tumors. As far as breast cancer is concerned an even longer interval is under discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.