Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2681225›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1989

The response of the Golgi complex to microtubule alterations: the roles of metabolic energy and membrane traffic in Golgi complex organization.

J R Turner, A M Tartakoff

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unlocking Golgi: Why Does Morphology Matter?Biochemistry. Biokhimiia · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ER trapping reveals Golgi enzymes continually revisit the ER through a recycling pathway that controls Golgi organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Chemical biology studies on norrisolide.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J R TurnerInstitute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.
A M Tartakoff
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

GOLGI COMPLEX: BIOCHEMICAL-CYTOLOGIC STUDIESR01AI021269 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI TARTAKOFF, ALAN MICHAEL · 1985 to 1988
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI-21269NIGMS NIH HHS GM-07250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A striking example of the interrelation between the Golgi complex (GC) and microtubules is the reversible fragmentation and dispersal of the GC which occurs upon microtubule depolymerization. We have characterized dispersal of the GC after nocodazole treatment as well as its recovery from the dispersed state by immunofluorescent localization of beta 1, 4-galactosyltransferase in Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells. Immunofluorescent anti-tubulin staining allowed simultaneous examination of the microtubule array. Based on our results, dispersal can be divided into a three-step process: microtubule depolymerization, GC fragmentation, and fragment dispersal. In cells treated with metabolic inhibitors after microtubule depolymerization, neither fragmentation nor dispersal occur, despite the absence of assembled microtubules. Thus, fragmentation is energy dependent and not tightly linked to microtubule depolymerization. The slowing of fragmentation and dispersal by monensin or ammonium chloride, as well as progressive inhibition at less than 34 degrees C, suggest that ongoing membrane traffic is required for these processes. Similarly, recovery may be separated into four steps: microtubule depolymerization, GC fragment centralization, fragment coalescence, and polarization of the reticular GC network. Fragment centralization and coalescence were arrested by metabolic inhibitors, despite the presence of microtubules. Neither monensin nor ammonium choride inhibited GC recovery. Partial inhibition of recovery at reduced temperatures paralleled the extent of microtubule assembly. These data demonstrate that dispersal and recovery are multi-step operations, and that the individual steps differ in temperature dependence, energy dependence, and sensitivity to ionic perturbation. GC distribution and microtubule status have also been clearly dissociate, thereby proving that organization of the GC is an active process that is not simply determined by microtubule binding. Furthermore, the results indicate that ongoing intra-GC membrane traffic may participate in fragmentation and dispersal.

Indexed as

Ammonium ChlorideAnimalsCell LineCycloheximideEnergy MetabolismFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGolgi ApparatusKineticsMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalMonensinNocodazoleTemperatureTubulinAmmonium ChlorideCycloheximideMonensinNocodazoleTubulin

Identifiers

PMID2681225
PMCPMC2115848
OpenAlexW2165296438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.