ArticlePLoS medicine2016
Strategies to Prevent Cholera Introduction during International Personnel Deployments: A Computational Modeling Analysis Based on the 2010 Haiti Outbreak.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating the Transmission Potential of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Cholera Cases From Household Microbiological and Clinical Data.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Estimating the Transmission Potential of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Cholera Cases from Household Microbiological and Clinical Data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Mathematical Modelling for Community Based Intervention for Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- UN peacekeeper health and risk factors --- a systematic scoping review.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- Informing policy via dynamic models: Cholera in Haiti.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Mathematical Models for Cholera Dynamics-A Review.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Neutralization of cholera toxin by Rosaceae family plant extracts.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2019Article
- Cholera: an overview with reference to the Yemen epidemic.Frontiers of medicine · 2019Review
- Measurement of Vaccine Direct Effects Under the Test-Negative Design.American journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- The potential impact of case-area targeted interventions in response to cholera outbreaks: A modeling study.PLoS medicine · 2018Article
- Cholera Epidemics of the Past Offer New Insights Into an Old Enemy.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018Article
- The importance of thinking beyond the water-supply in cholera epidemics: A historical urban case-study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Risks of Cholera Prophylaxis for United Nations Peacekeepers.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- UNstoppable: How Advocates Persevered in the Fight for Justice for Haitian Cholera Victims.Health and human rights · 2017Article
- Highlights of the 8th International Conference on Vaccines for Enteric Diseases: the Scottish Encounter To Defeat Diarrheal Diseases.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntroduction of Vibrio cholerae to Haiti during the deployment of United Nations (UN) peacekeepers in 2010 resulted in one of the largest cholera epidemics of the modern era. Following the outbreak, a UN-commissioned independent panel recommended three pre-deployment intervention strategies to minimize the risk of cholera introduction in future peacekeeping operations: screening for V. cholerae carriage, administering prophylactic antimicrobial chemotherapies, or immunizing with oral cholera vaccines. However, uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of these approaches has forestalled their implementation by the UN. We assessed how the interventions would have impacted the likelihood of the Haiti cholera epidemic. METHODS AND
findingsWe developed a stochastic model for cholera importation and transmission, fitted to reported cases during the first weeks of the 2010 outbreak in Haiti. Using this model, we estimated that diagnostic screening reduces the probability of cases occurring by 82% (95% credible interval: 75%, 85%); however, false-positive test outcomes may hamper this approach. Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis at time of departure and oral cholera vaccination reduce the probability of cases by 50% (41%, 57%) and by up to 61% (58%, 63%), respectively. Chemoprophylaxis beginning 1 wk before departure confers a 91% (78%, 96%) reduction independently, and up to a 98% reduction (94%, 99%) if coupled with vaccination. These results are not sensitive to assumptions about the background cholera incidence rate in the endemic troop-sending country. Further research is needed to (1) validate the sensitivity and specificity of rapid test approaches for detecting asymptomatic carriage, (2) compare prophylactic efficacy across antimicrobial regimens, and (3) quantify the impact of oral cholera vaccine on transmission from asymptomatic carriers.
conclusionsScreening, chemoprophylaxis, and vaccination are all effective strategies to prevent cholera introduction during large-scale personnel deployments such as that precipitating the 2010 Haiti outbreak. Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis was estimated to provide the greatest protection at the lowest cost among the approaches recently evaluated by the UN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.