ArticleDer Anaesthesist2016
[Preoperative patient-oriented advance planning of emergency and intensive care treatment--Necessary or imposition? : Questionnaire survey].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advance care planning and major cardiovascular surgery: do patients care?Intensive care medicine · 2017Article
- [Pre-operative documentation of individual in-patient therapy goals : A medical staff questionnaire].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional advance directives can often not be satisfactorily implemented into patient care; therefore, patient-oriented decision-making prior to scheduled interventions and beyond the actual surgery is of particular importance. Data on inpatient advance care planning (ACP) in Germany are lacking.
objectivesThis proof-of-concept study was carried out to determine the needs of inpatients undergoing surgery for advance preoperative planning of emergency care and to assess potential discomfort caused by such a program. MATERIAL AND
methodsA voluntary and anonymous standardized questionnaire survey was carried out in scheduled surgery inpatients over 50 years old. Data collection was structured in a demographic part and statements dealing with preoperative advance planning of emergency care in hospital evaluated as Likert items.
resultsOut of 579 patients (mean age 66 years, 51% male) 43% indicated a basic interest in being informed about advance planning of emergency care individually during the current hospital stay. Desire for patient self-determination represented an independent factor of information needs [p = 0.036, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.027-0.793]. The survey was perceived as a burden by only 7.3% of patients. This perception was independently associated with less concern about perioperative complication risks (p = 0.008, 95% CI 0.144-0.975).
conclusionThe results confirmed a substantial interest in patient-oriented advance planning of emergency care in a preoperative setting; however, no demographic group criteria for patients with information requirements could be defined. As the burden evoked by the topic is low, advance planning of emergency and intensive care treatment of inpatients undergoing surgery should be actively provided in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.