Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811794›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Community dynamics of nematodes after Larsen ice-shelf collapse in the eastern Antarctic Peninsula.

Freija Hauquier, Laura Ballesteros-Redondo, Julian Gutt, Ann Vanreusel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Freija HauquierMarine Biology Research Group Ghent University Krijgslaan 281 B-9000 Ghent Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-2162
Laura Ballesteros-RedondoMarine Biology Research Group Ghent University Krijgslaan 281 B-9000 Ghent Belgium.
Julian GuttAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Am Handelshafen 12 D-27570 Bremerhaven Germany.
Ann VanreuselMarine Biology Research Group Ghent University Krijgslaan 281 B-9000 Ghent Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free-living marine nematode communities of the Larsen B embayment at the eastern Antarctic Peninsula were investigated to provide insights on their response and colonization rate after large-scale ice-shelf collapse. This study compares published data on the post-collapse situation from 2007 with new material from 2011, focusing on two locations in the embayment that showed highly divergent communities in 2007 and that are characterized by a difference in timing of ice-shelf breakup. Data from 2007 exposed a more diverse community at outer station B.South, dominated by the genus Microlaimus. On the contrary, station B.West in the inner part of Larsen B was poor in both numbers of individuals and genera, with dominance of a single Halomonhystera species. Re-assessment of the situation in 2011 showed that communities at both stations diverged even more, due to a drastic increase in Halomonhystera at B.West compared to relatively little change at B.South. On a broader geographical scale, it seems that B.South gradually starts resembling other Antarctic shelf communities, although the absence of the genus Sabatieria and the high abundance of Microlaimus still set it apart nine years after the main Larsen B collapse. In contrast, thriving of Halomonhystera at B.West further separates its community from other Antarctic shelf areas.

Indexed as

Biodiversitycolonizationcommunity dynamicsHalomonhysteraice‐shelf collapseLarsen Bmarine free‐living NematodaMicrolaimus

Identifiers

PMID26811794
PMCPMC4716525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.