Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811653›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Advanced gastric cancer: What we know and what we still have to learn.

Federico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Simona Cima, Maria Carla Valli, Gabriela E Nita, Arianna Heyer, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. HIPEC with CRS versus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the gastric cancer metastasis to peritoneum.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federico CoccoliniFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Giulia MontoriFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Marco CeresoliFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Simona CimaFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Maria Carla ValliFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Gabriela E NitaFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Arianna HeyerFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Fausto CatenaFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Luca AnsaloniFederico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Gabriela E Nita, Luca Ansaloni, Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is a common neoplastic disease and, more precisely, is the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, with differences amongst geographic areas. The definition of advanced gastric cancer is still debated. Different stadiating systems lead to slightly different stadiation of the disease, thus leading to variations between the single countries in the treatment and outcomes. In the present review all the possibilities of treatment for advanced gastric cancer have been analyzed. Surgery, the cornerstone of treatment for advanced gastric cancer, is analyzed first, followed by an investigation of the different forms and drugs of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. New frontiers in treatment suggest the growing consideration for intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapeutics and combination of traditional drugs with new ones. Moreover, the necessity to prevent the relapse of the disease leads to the consideration of administering intraperitoneal chemotherapy earlier in the therapeutical algorithm.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDrug Administration RoutesHumansLaparoscopyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsAdvanced gastric cancerChemotherapyDefinitionHypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyIntraperitonealSurgery

Identifiers

PMID26811653
PMCPMC4716026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.