Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811644›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

How to predict clinical relapse in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Elisa Liverani, Eleonora Scaioli, Richard John Digby, Matteo Bellanova, Andrea Belluzzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Interplay between volemic balance and the intestinal tract: insights on biomarkers and diagnostic tests used to assess intestinal morphofunctional barrier.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisa LiveraniElisa Liverani, Eleonora Scaioli, Matteo Bellanova, Andrea Belluzzi, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Eleonora ScaioliElisa Liverani, Eleonora Scaioli, Matteo Bellanova, Andrea Belluzzi, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Richard John DigbyElisa Liverani, Eleonora Scaioli, Matteo Bellanova, Andrea Belluzzi, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Matteo BellanovaElisa Liverani, Eleonora Scaioli, Matteo Bellanova, Andrea Belluzzi, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Andrea BelluzziElisa Liverani, Eleonora Scaioli, Matteo Bellanova, Andrea Belluzzi, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases have a natural course characterized by alternating periods of remission and relapse. Disease flares occur in a random way and are currently unpredictable for the most part. Predictors of benign or unfavourable clinical course are required to facilitate treatment decisions and to avoid overtreatment. The present article provides a literature review of the current evidence on the main clinical, genetic, endoscopic, histologic, serologic and fecal markers to predict aggressiveness of inflammatory bowel disease and discuss their prognostic role, both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. No single marker seems to be reliable alone as a flare predictor, even in light of promising evidence regarding the role of fecal markers, in particular fecal calprotectin, which has reported good results recently. In order to improve our daily clinical practice, validated prognostic scores should be elaborated, integrating clinical and biological markers of prognosis. Finally, we propose an algorithm considering clinical history and biological markers to intercept patients with high risk of clinical relapse.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersBiopsyColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseDecision Support TechniquesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGenetic TestingHumansPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersClinical predictorsClinical relapseCrohn’s diseaseFecal calprotectinUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID26811644
PMCPMC4716017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.