ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical site infection after open and laparoscopic surgery in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Pooled it
- Redo-laparoscopy in the management of complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Pooled it
- Enhancing laparoscopic surgery training: a comparative study of traditional models and automated error detection system.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Social health organizations and their role in the diffusion of minimally invasive surgery in Brazil.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Advances in Minimally Invasive General Surgery: A Narrative Review of Techniques, Technologies, and Patient Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Oxycodone Combined with Dexmedetomidine versus Oxycodone Alone and Sufentanil for Early Postoperative Analgesia and Perioperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Appendicitis: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Gynecological Cancer: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advancing Ergonomics in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery: a Proposed Unified Ergonomic Checklist for Minimally Invasive Surgeries in Obesity (UEC-MISO).Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Emergency Laparoscopy for Complex and Trauma Cases: Feasibility and Outcomes in Experienced Surgical Teams.Cureus · 2025Article
- Review
- Optimizing skill acquisition: the role of self-assessment during a continuous training program for laparoscopic suturing.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Minimally invasive approach to peritonitis from left colonic perforation: a retrospective multicenter observational study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Reclaim the duct! Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the acute care surgeon.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
- Role of laparoscopic surgery in managing hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients: a single level I trauma center, propensity score matching study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Eye tracking and audio sensors to evaluate surgeon's non-technical skills: An empirical study.Applied ergonomics · 2024Article
- The Influence of Obesity on Cholecystectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The greatest advantages of laparoscopy when compared to open surgery include the faster recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased postoperative pain, earlier return to work and resumption of normal daily activity as well as cosmetic benefits. Laparoscopy today is considered the gold standard of care in the treatment of cholecystitis and appendicitis worldwide. Laparoscopy has even been adopted in colorectal surgery with good results. The technological improvements in this surgical field along with the development of modern techniques and the acquisition of specific laparoscopic skills have allowed for its utilization in operations with fully intracorporeal anastomoses. Further progress in laparoscopy has included single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice trans-luminal endoscopic surgery. Nevertheless, laparoscopy for emergency surgery is still considered challenging and is usually not recommended due to the lack of adequate experience in this area. The technical difficulties of operating in the presence of diffuse peritonitis or large purulent collections and diffuse adhesions are also given as reasons. However, the potential advantages of laparoscopy, both in terms of diagnosis and therapy, are clear. Major advantages may be observed in cases with diffuse peritonitis secondary to perforated peptic ulcers, for example, where laparoscopy allows the confirmation of the diagnosis, the identification of the position of the ulcer and a laparoscopic repair with effective peritoneal washout. Laparoscopy has also revolutionized the approach to complicated diverticulitis even when intestinal perforation is present. Many other emergency conditions can be effectively managed laparoscopically, including trauma in select hemodynamically-stable patients. We have therefore reviewed the most recent scientific literature on advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma in order to demonstrate the current indications and outcomes associated with a laparoscopic approach to the treatment of the most common emergency surgical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.