Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811612›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: Clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis.

Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Keiko Sasaki, Hiroyuki Ono

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroyuki MatsubayashiHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Toru MatsuiHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Yohei YabuuchiHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Kenichiro ImaiHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Masaki TanakaHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Naomi KakushimaHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Keiko SasakiHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Hiroyuki OnoHiroyuki Matsubayashi, Toru Matsui, Yohei Yabuuchi, Kenichiro Imai, Masaki Tanaka, Naomi Kakushima, Hiroyuki Ono, Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Suntogun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been applied to pancreaticobiliary lesions since the 1990s and is in widespread use throughout the world today. We used this method to confirm the pathological evidence of the pancreaticobiliary lesions and to perform suitable therapies. Complications of EUS-FNA are quite rare, but some of them are severe. Operators should master conventional EUS observation and experience a minimum of 20-30 cases of supervised EUS-FNA on non-pancreatic and pancreatic lesions before attempting solo EUS-FNA. Studies conducted on pancreaticobiliary EUS-FNA have focused on selection of suitable instruments (e.g., needle selection) and sampling techniques (e.g., fanning method, suction level, with or without a stylet, optimum number of passes). Today, the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA is still improving; the detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) currently has a sensitivity of 90%-95% and specificity of 95%-100%. In addition to PC, a variety of rare pancreatic tumors can be discriminated by conducting immunohistochemistry on the FNA materials. A flexible, large caliber needle has been used to obtain a large piece of tissue, which can provide sufficient histological information to be helpful in classifying benign pancreatic lesions. EUS-FNA can supply high diagnostic yields even for biliary lesions or peri-pancreaticobiliary lymph nodes. This review focuses on the clinical aspects of EUS-FNA in the pancreaticobiliary field, with the aim of providing information that can enable more accurate and efficient diagnosis.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationBiliary Tract NeoplasmsClinical CompetenceEquipment DesignHumansLearning CurveNeedlesPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsCancerDiagnosisEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspirationPancreaticPancreaticobiliary

Identifiers

PMID26811612
PMCPMC4716064
OpenAlexW2412528815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.