Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811438›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2016

Cost-effectiveness of the 'Walcheren Integrated Care Model' intervention for community-dwelling frail elderly.

Wilhelmina M Looman, Robbert Huijsman, Clazien A M Bouwmans-Frijters, Elly A Stolk, Isabelle N Fabbricotti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wilhelmina M LoomanInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. looman@bmg.eur.nl.
Robbert HuijsmanInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clazien A M Bouwmans-FrijtersInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elly A StolkInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabelle N FabbricottiInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important aim of integrated care for frail elderly is to generate more cost-effective health care. However, empirical research on the cost-effectiveness of integrated care for community-dwelling frail elderly is limited.

objectiveThis study reports on the cost-effectiveness of the Walcheren Integrated Care Model (WICM) after 12 months from a societal perspective.

methodsThe design of this study was quasi-experimental. In total, 184 frail elderly patients from 3 GP practices that implemented the WICM were compared with 193 frail elderly patients of 5 GP practices that provided care as usual. Effects were determined by health-related quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire). Costs were assessed based on questionnaires, GP files, time registrations and reports from multidisciplinary meetings. Average costs and effects were compared using t-tests. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and bootstrap methods were used to determine its reliability.

resultsNeither the WICM nor care as usual resulted in a change in health-related quality of life. The average total costs of the WICM were higher than care as usual (17089 euros versus 15189 euros). The incremental effects were 0.00, whereas the incremental costs were 1970 euros, indicating an ICER of 412450 euros.

conclusionsThe WICM is not cost-effective, and the costs per quality-adjusted life year are high. The costs of the integrated care intervention do not outweigh the limited effects on health-related quality of life after 12 months. More analyses of the cost-effectiveness of integrated care for community-dwelling frail elderly are recommended as well as consideration of the specific costs and effects.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyIndependent LivingActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleNetherlandsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCost-effectivenesseconomic evaluationfrail elderlygeneral practiceintegrated health care systemsprevention.

Identifiers

PMID26811438
PMCPMC4793802
OpenAlexW2284752880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.