Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811173›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2016

A review of heart chamber segmentation for structural and functional analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Peng Peng, Karim Lekadir, Ali Gooya, Ling Shao, Steffen E Petersen, Alejandro F Frangi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
29.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Accurate Reconstruction of Right Heart Shape and Motion From Cine-MRI for Image-Driven Computational Hemodynamics.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  13. Automatic vessel segmentation and reformation of non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography using transfer learning-based three-dimensional U-net with attention mechanism.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Combining generative modelling and semi-supervised domain adaptation for whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography segmentation.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Peng PengDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
Karim LekadirUniversitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002, Barcelona, Spain.
Ali GooyaDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
Ling ShaoDepartment of Computer Science and Digital Technologies, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Steffen E PetersenCentre Lead for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Alejandro F FrangiDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK. a.frangi@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-528X
University of Sheffield · GBNorthumbria University · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become a key imaging modality in clinical cardiology practice due to its unique capabilities for non-invasive imaging of the cardiac chambers and great vessels. A wide range of CMR sequences have been developed to assess various aspects of cardiac structure and function, and significant advances have also been made in terms of imaging quality and acquisition times. A lot of research has been dedicated to the development of global and regional quantitative CMR indices that help the distinction between health and pathology. The goal of this review paper is to discuss the structural and functional CMR indices that have been proposed thus far for clinical assessment of the cardiac chambers. We include indices definitions, the requirements for the calculations, exemplar applications in cardiovascular diseases, and the corresponding normal ranges. Furthermore, we review the most recent state-of-the art techniques for the automatic segmentation of the cardiac boundaries, which are necessary for the calculation of the CMR indices. Finally, we provide a detailed discussion of the existing literature and of the future challenges that need to be addressed to enable a more robust and comprehensive assessment of the cardiac chambers in clinical practice.

Indexed as

HeartHeart DiseasesHeart Function TestsHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardiumPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCardiac segmentationClinical assessmentMRI

Identifiers

PMID26811173
PMCPMC4830888
OpenAlexW2255189008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.