Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26811154›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2016

Extracting DNA words based on the sequence features: non-uniform distribution and integrity.

Zhi Li, Hongyan Cao, Yuehua Cui, Yanbo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhi LiDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China. china140106@126.com.
Hongyan CaoDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China. cao_hong_yan@qq.com.
Yuehua CuiDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China. cui@stt.msu.edu.
Yanbo ZhangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China. sxmuzyb@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA sequence can be viewed as an unknown language with words as its functional units. Given that most sequence alignment algorithms such as the motif discovery algorithms depend on the quality of background information about sequences, it is necessary to develop an ab initio algorithm for extracting the "words" based only on the DNA sequences.

methodsWe considered that non-uniform distribution and integrity were two important features of a word, based on which we developed an ab initio algorithm to extract "DNA words" that have potential functional meaning. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for consistency test of uniform distribution of DNA sequences, and the integrity was judged by the sequence and position alignment. Two random base sequences were adopted as negative control, and an English book was used as positive control to verify our algorithm. We applied our algorithm to the genomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 10 strains of Escherichia coli to show the utility of the methods.

resultsThe results provide strong evidences that the algorithm is a promising tool for ab initio building a DNA dictionary.

conclusionsOur method provides a fast way for large scale screening of important DNA elements and offers potential insights into the understanding of a genome.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromosomesComputational BiologyDNAEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialGenome, FungalPlasmidsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence AlignmentSoftwareDNA

Identifiers

PMID26811154
PMCPMC4727310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.