Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810978›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Reliability of the evaluation of posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar spine trauma with the use of computed tomography scan.

Alecio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Ricardo Vieira Botelho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of various methods for measuring interspinous widening in thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex injury shown on MRI.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Response to Letter to the Editor.International journal of spine surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Thoracolumbar spine trauma: a guide for the FRCS examination.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolated multiple lumbar transverse process fractures with spinal instability: an uncommon yet serious association.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The radiologic assessment of posterior ligamentous complex injury in patients with thoracolumbar fracture.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  15. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation plus kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar fractures A2, A3 and B2.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  16. Another diagnostic tool in thoracolumbar posterior ligament complex injury: interspinous distance ratio.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alecio Cristino Evangelista Santos BarcelosNeurosurgery Division, Hospital Estadual de Emergência e Trauma Senador Humberto Lucena, Avenida Esperança, Avenida Orestes Lisboa S/N, Bairro Pedro Gondim, João Pessoa, 58031090, Paraíba, Brazil. aleciobarcelos.ineuro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-2327
Andrei Fernandes JoaquimDepartment of Neurology, University of Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo Vieira BotelhoNeurosurgery Division, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Av. Ibirapuera, 981, Indianópolis, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Ibirapuera · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe AOSpine thoracolumbar (TL) spine injury classification system is based mainly on computed tomography (CT). The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of CT scan in the diagnosis of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in thoracolumbar spine trauma (TLST).

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of 43 patients with TLST. CT scans were evaluated independently by three spine surgeons on two separate occasions, 2 months apart. The reliability of PLC injury parameters was assessed by the Kappa coefficient (κ) and the average percentage of these parameters was established. Injuries were classified according to the AOSpine classification as type A (compression), B (anterior and/or posterior tension band injuries) or C (dislocation) injury and the reliability of the classification was calculated.

resultsOn average, PLC injury was identified in 91.4% of type B or C injuries. Tension band injury and dislocation were found in 90.5% of type B and 93.2% of type C injuries. The intraobserver reliability for the PLC injury parameters ranged from 0.518 to 1.000, except for increased interspinous distance (IID). Interobserver reliability ranged from 0.303 to 0.688. When the patients were evaluated as a whole, dislocation showed the highest κ (0.656 and 0.688). When type A or B injuries were assessed, the highest κ were found for IID (0.533 and 0.511) and tension band injury (0.486 and 0.452). The κ for AOSpine classification was 0.526 and 0.645 in both assessments.

conclusionsIn this study, the use of CT scan as the only diagnostic tool could identify PLC injury in most cases and demonstrated satisfactory reliability. Dislocation could satisfactorily diagnose type C injury, while IID was the best parameter to differentiate between type A and B injuries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJoint DislocationsLigamentsLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSpinal InjuriesThoracic VertebraeTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultComputed tomographyLongitudinal ligamentsPosterior ligamentous complexReliabilitySpinal fractures

Identifiers

PMID26810978
OpenAlexW2259691758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.