ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Integrating mutation and gene expression cross-sectional data to infer cancer progression.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- SNPs-Panel Polymorphism Variations inBiomedicines · 2023Article
- Combining bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data to develop an NK cell-related prognostic signature for hepatocellular carcinoma based on an integrated machine learning framework.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Article
- Mathematical modeling the order of driver gene mutations in colorectal cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Construction and comprehensive analysis of a novel prognostic signature associated with pyroptosis molecular subtypes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- An Analysis of Transcriptomic Burden Identifies Biological Progression Roadmaps for Hematological Malignancies and Solid Tumors.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Identification of Breast Cancer Subtype-Specific Biomarkers by Integrating Copy Number Alterations and Gene Expression Profiles.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Derivation and Application of Molecular Signatures to Prostate Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.Cancers · 2021Review
- Article
- Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Classification by Integrating Somatic Mutation and Gene Expression.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Interrogating Mutant Allele Expression via Customized Reference Genomes to Define Influential Cancer Mutations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Integrating germline and somatic variation information using genomic data for the discovery of biomarkers in prostate cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Network-based method for detecting dysregulated pathways in glioblastoma cancer.IET systems biology · 2018Article
- Genetic load makes cancer cells more sensitive to common drugs: evidence from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA major problem in identifying the best therapeutic targets for cancer is the molecular heterogeneity of the disease. Cancer is often caused by an accumulation of mutations which produce irreversible damage to the cell's control mechanisms of survival and proliferation. Different mutations may affect these cellular anachronisms through a combination of molecular interactions which may be dynamically changing during cancer progression. It has been previously shown that cancer accumulates mutations over time. In this paper we address the problem of cancer heterogeneity by modeling cancer progression using somatic mutation and gene expression cross-sectional data.
resultsWe propose a novel formulation of integrating somatic mutation and gene expression data to infer the temporal sequence of events from cross-sectional data. Using a mixed integer linear program we model the interaction between groups of different mutated genes and the resulting modifications at the gene expression level. Our approach identifies a partition of mutation events which gradually produce gene expression changes to a partition of genes over time. The proposed formulation is tested using both simulated data and real breast cancer data with matched somatic mutations and gene expression measurements from The Cancer Genome Atlas. First, we classify the genes as oncogenes or tumor suppressors based on the frequency of driver mutations. As expected, the most frequently mutated genes in breast cancer are PIK3CA and TP53 genes. Then, we select those genes with most frequent driver mutations and a set of genes known to play roles in cancer development. Furthermore, we apply the proposed mixed integer linear program to identify the temporal order in which genes mutate and, simultaneously, the changes they produce at the gene expression level during cancer progression. In addition, we are able to identify known causal relationships between mutations and gene expression changes in PI3K/AKT and TP53 pathways.
conclusionsThis paper proposes a new model to infer the temporal sequence in which mutations occur and lead to changes at the gene expression level during cancer progression. The approach is general and can be applied to any data sets with available somatic mutations and gene expression measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.