ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2016
Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.
Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Cloud-based multi-media systems for patient education and adherence: a pilot study to explore patient compliance with colonoscopy procedure preparation.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementColonoscopy is a powerful screening method for colorectal cancer. However, colonoscopy performance is highly variable and quality indicators are needed to ensure delivery of high-quality healthcare. A multi-society task force has recently identified three priority quality indicators in colonoscopy: adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. The best-studied quality indicator is the adenoma detection rate, which is inversely correlated to the risk of interval colorectal cancer. Other important quality determinants include colonoscopy withdrawal time and the bowel preparation quality. It is important to note that these quality metrics are interrelated and optimization at every level is necessary for any high-quality colorectal cancer screening and prevention program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26810839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.