Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810718›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2016

Efficacy of glatiramer acetate in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a multicenter retrospective study.

Ilya Ayzenberg, Joanna Schöllhammer, Robert Hoepner, Kerstin Hellwig, Marius Ringelstein, Orhan Aktas, Tania Kümpfel, Markus Krumbholz, Corinna Trebst, Friedemann Paul and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Double-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Glatiramer acetate immune modulates B-cell antigen presentation in treatment of MS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Pediatric Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilya AyzenbergDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Joanna SchöllhammerDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Robert HoepnerDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Kerstin HellwigDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Marius RingelsteinDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Orhan AktasDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tania KümpfelInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Markus KrumbholzInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Corinna TrebstDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Friedemann PaulNeurocure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Florence PacheNeurocure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mark ObermannDepartment of Neurology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Lena ZeltnerDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Matthias SchwabDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Achim BertheleDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sven JariusMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ingo KleiterDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany. ingo.kleiter@rub.de.
Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group
St. Josef-Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEInstitute of Neuroimmunology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKJena University Hospital · DEMax Delbrück Center · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an approved therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but its efficacy for the prevention of attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains unknown. We did a multicenter retrospective analysis of GA-treated patients with NMOSD, identified through a national registry. Annualized relapse rate and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were the main outcome measures. We identified 23 GA-treated patients (21 female, 16 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive). GA was given for <6 months in seven patients; reasons for stopping were relapses (n = 3), confirmation of NMOSD (n = 2) and side effects (n = 2). Of 16 patients treated ≥ 6 months with GA (15 female, 11 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive), 14 experienced at least one relapse. There was no reduction in the mean annualized relapse rate in the total group (1.9 ± 1.1 before vs. 1.8 ± 1.4 during GA therapy), as well as in those patients who were aquaporin-4 antibody-positive, or had a history of prior immunotherapy or not. The median EDSS increased (2.5 start vs. 3.5 finish of GA, P < 0.05). GA therapy was discontinued in 15/16 patients; reasons were therapeutic inefficacy in 13 and post-injection skin reactions in two patients. We conclude that GA is not beneficial for preventing attacks in most patients with NMOSD, particularly in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive cases.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdultAntibodiesAquaporin 4Disability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlatiramer AcetateHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedNeuromyelitis OpticaRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricYoung AdultAntibodiesAQP4 protein, humanAquaporin 4Glatiramer AcetateImmunosuppressive AgentsAquaporin-4 antibodyDevic’s diseaseGlatiramer acetateMyelitisNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorderOptic neuritis

Identifiers

PMID26810718
OpenAlexW2254200837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.