Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810647›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Effect of Media Modified To Mimic Cystic Fibrosis Sputum on the Susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus, and the Frequency of Resistance at One Center.

David A Stevens, Richard B Moss, Cathy Hernandez, Karl V Clemons, Marife Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anti-Fungal (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Azole-Resistance Development; How theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Parasexual recombination enablesERJ open research · 2020
    Article
  9. Azole-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A StevensDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA stevens@stanford.edu.
Richard B MossDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Cathy HernandezDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Karl V ClemonsDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA.
Marife MartinezCalifornia Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of cystic fibrosis (CF) patient exacerbations attributed toPseudomonas aeruginosainfection have indicated a lack of correlation of outcome within vitrosusceptibility results. One explanation is that the media used for testing do not mimic the airway milieu, resulting in incorrect conclusions. Therefore, media have been devised to mimic CF sputum.Aspergillus fumigatusis the leading fungal pathogen in CF, and susceptibility testing is also used to decide therapeutic choices. We assessed whether media designed to mimic CF sputa would give different fungal susceptibility results than those of classical methods, assaying voriconazole, the most utilized anti-Aspergillusdrug in this setting, and 30 CFAspergillusisolates. The frequency of marked resistance (defined as an MIC of >4 μg/ml) in our CF unit by classical methods is 7%. Studies performed with classical methods and with digested sputum medium, synthetic sputum medium, and artificial sputum medium revealed prominent differences inAspergillussusceptibility results, as well as growth rate, with each medium. Clinical correlative studies are required to determine which results are most useful in predicting outcome. Comparison of MICs with non-CF isolates also indicated the CF isolates were generally more resistant.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusBiomimetic MaterialsCystic FibrosisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSputumVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID26810647
PMCPMC4808157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.