Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810389›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

"You kind of want to fix it don't you?" Exploring general practice trainees' experiences of managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms.

Mary Howman, Kate Walters, Joe Rosenthal, Rola Ajjawi, Marta Buszewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Persistent unexplained physical symptoms: a prospective longitudinal cohort study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. "It´s incredible how much I´ve had to fight." Negotiating medical uncertainty in clinical encounters.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary HowmanDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL (Royal Free Campus), Upper Third Floor, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW32PF, UK. m.howman@nhs.net.
Kate WaltersResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL (Royal Free Campus), Upper Third Floor, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW32PF, UK. k.walters@ucl.ac.uk.
Joe RosenthalResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL (Royal Free Campus), Upper Third Floor, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW32PF, UK. j.rosenthal@ucl.ac.uk.
Rola AjjawiCentre for Medical Education, Dundee Medical School, The Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK. r.ajjawi@dundee.ac.uk.
Marta BuszewiczResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL (Royal Free Campus), Upper Third Floor, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW32PF, UK. m.buszewicz@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuch of a General Practitioner's (GP) workload consists of managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). GP trainees are often taking responsibility for looking after people with MUS for the first time and so are well placed to reflect on this and the preparation they have had for it; their views have not been documented in detail in the literature. This study aimed to explore GP trainees' clinical and educational experiences of managing people presenting with MUS.

methodA mixed methods approach was adopted. All trainees from four London GP vocational training schemes were invited to take part in a questionnaire and in-depth semi-structured interviews. The questionnaire explored educational and clinical experiences and attitudes towards MUS using Likert scales and free text responses. The interviews explored the origins of these views and experiences in more detail and documented ideas about optimising training about MUS. Interviews were analysed using the framework analysis approach.

resultsEighty questionnaires out of 120 (67%) were returned and a purposive sample of 15 trainees interviewed. Results suggested most trainees struggled to manage the uncertainty inherent in MUS consultations, feeling they often over-investigated or referred for their own reassurance. They described difficulty in broaching possible psychological aspects and/or providing appropriate explanations to patients for their symptoms. They thought that more preparation was needed throughout their training. Some had more positive experiences and found such consultations rewarding, usually after several consultations and developing a relationship with the patient.

conclusionManaging MUS is a common problem for GP trainees and results in a disproportionate amount of anxiety, frustration and uncertainty. Their training needs to better reflect their clinical experience to prepare them for managing such scenarios, which should also improve patient care.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAttitude of Health PersonnelEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicLondonMaleQualitative ResearchSomatoform DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID26810389
PMCPMC4727318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.