Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810218›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2016

How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales.

Thibault Saubusse, Jean-Daniel Masson, Mireille Le Dimma, David Abrial, Clara Marcé, Regine Martin-Schaller, Anne Dupire, Marie-Frédérique Le Potier, Sophie Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Red deer (Viruses · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thibault SaubusseONCFS, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Unité Sanitaire de la Faune, Micropolis, la Bérardie, Belle Aureille, 05000, Gap, France. tsaubusse@gmail.com.
Jean-Daniel MassonONCFS, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Unité Sanitaire de la Faune, Micropolis, la Bérardie, Belle Aureille, 05000, Gap, France. jean-daniel.masson@live.fr.
Mireille Le DimmaAnses, Laboratoire de Ploufragan/Plouzané, Unité Virologie Immunologie Porcines, BP53, 22440, Ploufragan, France. mireille.ledimma@anses.fr.
David AbrialINRA, Unité d'Epidémiologie Animale, Theix, 63122, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France. david.abrial@clermont.inra.fr.
Clara MarcéDirection générale de l'alimentation, Bureau de la santé animale, Paris, France. clara.marce@agriculture.gouv.fr.
Regine Martin-SchallerDirection départementale de la protection des populations du Bas-Rhin, Strasbourg, France. regine.martin-schaller@bas-rhin.gouv.fr.
Anne DupireDirection départementale de la protection des populations de la Moselle, Metz, France. anne.dupire@moselle.gouv.fr.
Marie-Frédérique Le PotierAnses, Laboratoire de Ploufragan/Plouzané, Unité Virologie Immunologie Porcines, BP53, 22440, Ploufragan, France. marie-frederique.lepotier@anses.fr.
Sophie RossiONCFS, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Unité Sanitaire de la Faune, Micropolis, la Bérardie, Belle Aureille, 05000, Gap, France. sophie.rossi@oncfs.gouv.fr.
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral mass vaccination (OMV) is considered as an efficient strategy for controlling classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar. After the completion of vaccination, the presence of antibodies in 6-12 month-old hunted wild boars was expected to reflect a recent CSF circulation. Nevertheless, antibodies could also correspond to the long-lasting of maternal antibodies. This paper relates an experience of surveillance which lasted 4 years after the completion of OMV in a formerly vaccinated area, in north-eastern France (2010-2014). First, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the serological data collected in 6-12 month-old hunted wild boars from 2010 up to 2013, using a spatial Bayesian model accounting for hunting data autocorrelation and heterogeneity. At the level of the whole area, seroprevalence in juvenile boars decreased from 28% in 2010-2011 down to 1% in 2012-2013, but remained locally high (above 5%). The model revealed the existence of one particular seroprevalence hot-spot where a longitudinal survey of marked animals was conducted in 2013-2014, for deciphering the origin of antibodies. Eleven out of 107 captured piglets were seropositive when 3-4 months-old, but their antibody titres progressively decreased until 6-7 months of age. These results suggest piglets were carrying maternal antibodies, few of them carrying maternal antibodies lasting until the hunting season. Our study shows that OMV may generate confusion in the CSF surveillance several years after the completion of vaccination. We recommend using quantitative serological tools, hunting data modelling and capture approaches for better interpreting serological results after vaccination completion. Surveillance perspectives are further discussed.

Indexed as

Sus scrofaAdministration, OralAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralClassical Swine FeverClassical Swine Fever VirusEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleFranceMaleMass VaccinationPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSeroepidemiologic StudiesSwineAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26810218
PMCPMC4727256
OpenAlexW2258289526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.