Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810188›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Combined niclosamide with cisplatin inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor growth in cisplatin-resistant triple-negative breast cancer.

Junjun Liu, Xiaosong Chen, Toby Ward, Mark Pegram, Kunwei Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Double Repositioning: Veterinary Antiparasitic to Human Anticancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Drug Repurposing for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Junjun LiuComprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Univerisity School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaosong ChenComprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Univerisity School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Toby WardStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive West, Suite G2021, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mark PegramStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, 265 Campus Drive West, Suite G2021, Stanford, CA, USA. mpegram@stanford.edu.
Kunwei ShenComprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Univerisity School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. kwshen@medmail.com.cn.
Ruijin Hospital · CNStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with triple-negative breast cancer have worse prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Acquired drug resistance remains to be an important reason influencing triple-negative breast cancer treatment efficacy. A prevailing theory postulates that the cancer resistance and recurrence results from a subpopulation of tumor cells with stemness program, which are often insensitive to cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin. Recent studies suggested that niclosamide, an anti-helminthic drug, has potential therapeutic activities against breast cancer stem cells, which prompts us to determine its roles on eliminating cisplatin-resistant cancer cells. Hence, we established a stable cisplatin-resistant MDA-MB-231 cell line (231-CR) through continuously exposure to increasing concentrations of cisplatin (5-20 μmol/l). Interestingly, 231-CR exhibited properties associated to epithelial-mesenchymal transition with enhanced invasion, preserved proliferation, increased mammosphere formation, and reduced apoptosis compared to naive MDA-MB-231 sensitive cells (231-CS). Importantly, niclosamide or combination with cisplatin inhibited both 231-CS and 231-CR cell proliferation in vitro. In addition, niclosamide reversed the EMT phenotype of 231-CR by downregulation of snail and vimentin. Mechanistically, niclosamide treatment in combination with or without cisplatin significantly inhibited Akt, ERK, and Src signaling pathways. In vivo study showed that niclosamide or combination with cisplatin could repress the growth of xenografts originated from either 231-CS or 231-CR cells, with prominent suppression of Ki67 expression. These findings suggested that niclosamide might serve as a novel therapeutic strategy, either alone or in combination with cisplatin, for triple-negative breast cancer treatment, especially those resistant to cisplatin.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticestodal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBlotting, WesternCell MovementCell ProliferationCisplatinDrug Therapy, CombinationEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeAnticestodal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinNiclosamideCisplatin resistanceEpithelial-mesenchymal transitionNiclosamideTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID26810188
OpenAlexW2253181003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.