Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26810135›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2017

Impact of germline and somatic missense variations on drug binding sites.

C Yan, N Pattabiraman, J Goecks, P Lam, A Nayak, Y Pan, J Torcivia-Rodriguez, A Voskanian, Q Wan, R Mazumder

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C YanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
N PattabiramanMolBox LLC, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
J GoecksThe Computational Biology Institute, George Washington University, Ashburn, VA, USA.
P LamDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
A NayakDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Y PanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
J Torcivia-RodriguezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
A VoskanianDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Q WanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
R MazumderDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University · USGeorge Washington University Virginia Campus · USMcCormick (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are generating a vast amount of data. This exacerbates the current challenge of translating NGS data into actionable clinical interpretations. We have comprehensively combined germline and somatic nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variations (nsSNVs) that affect drug binding sites in order to investigate their prevalence. The integrated data thus generated in conjunction with exome or whole-genome sequencing can be used to identify patients who may not respond to a specific drug because of alterations in drug binding efficacy due to nsSNVs in the target protein's gene. To identify the nsSNVs that may affect drug binding, protein-drug complex structures were retrieved from Protein Data Bank (PDB) followed by identification of amino acids in the protein-drug binding sites using an occluded surface method. Then, the germline and somatic mutations were mapped to these amino acids to identify which of these alter protein-drug binding sites. Using this method we identified 12 993 amino acid-drug binding sites across 253 unique proteins bound to 235 unique drugs. The integration of amino acid-drug binding sites data with both germline and somatic nsSNVs data sets revealed 3133 nsSNVs affecting amino acid-drug binding sites. In addition, a comprehensive drug target discovery was conducted based on protein structure similarity and conservation of amino acid-drug binding sites. Using this method, 81 paralogs were identified that could serve as alternative drug targets. In addition, non-human mammalian proteins bound to drugs were used to identify 142 homologs in humans that can potentially bind to drugs. In the current protein-drug pairs that contain somatic mutations within their binding site, we identified 85 proteins with significant differential gene expression changes associated with specific cancer types. Information on protein-drug binding predicted drug target proteins and prevalence of both somatic and germline nsSNVs that disrupt these binding sites can provide valuable knowledge for personalized medicine treatment. A web portal is available where nsSNVs from individual patient can be checked by scanning against DrugVar to determine whether any of the SNVs affect the binding of any drug in the database.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGerm-Line MutationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutation, MissensePharmacogenomic VariantsAnimalsBinding SitesDatabases, GeneticData MiningGenotypeHumansModels, MolecularPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacogeneticsPhenotypePrecision MedicinePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID26810135
PMCPMC5380835
OpenAlexW2270496227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.