ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2016
Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia According to the Number of High-Risk Findings at Index Colonoscopy: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Article
- Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition.Intestinal research · 2023Review
- Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance: 2022 revised edition.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- [Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 Revised Edition].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022Review
- Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice.Intestinal research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData regarding outcomes for patients with multiple findings for high-risk adenomas are scarce.
aimTo compare the risk for colorectal neoplasm (CRN) recurrence according to the number of high-risk findings.
methodsThis was a retrospective and multicenter study. Patients who had one or more high-risk adenomas at the index colonoscopy and underwent follow-up colonoscopy 2.5 or more years after the index colonoscopy were included. The number of high-risk findings was defined as follows: number of adenomas larger than 1 cm + number of adenomas with HGD + number of adenomas with a villous component + existence (counted as 1) or nonexistence (counted as 0) of three or more adenomas.
resultsA total of 1646 patients were included, and the mean duration between index and follow-up colonoscopy was approximately 4 years. The cumulative incidence rate of recurrent advanced CRN in patients with three or more high-risk findings was higher than that in patients with one or two high-risk findings (p < 0.001). However, the difference in 3-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrent advanced CRN between the two groups was not great, although it was statistically significant (4.8 vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.039).
conclusionsA 3-year surveillance interval for patients with multiple high-risk findings, regardless of the number of high-risk findings, appears reasonable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.