Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26809621›Full record

ArticleOecologia2016

Diurnal adjustment in ultraviolet sunscreen protection is widespread among higher plants.

Paul W Barnes, Stephan D Flint, Mark A Tobler, Ronald J Ryel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Photoprotective Role of Photosynthetic and Non-Photosynthetic Pigments inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: Progress report, 2016.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paul W BarnesDepartment of Biological Sciences and Environment Program, Loyola University New Orleans, 6363 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA. pwbarnes@loyno.edu.
Stephan D FlintDepartment of Forest, Rangeland and Fire Sciences, UIPO 441135, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844-1135, USA.
Mark A ToblerDepartment of Biological Sciences and Environment Program, Loyola University New Orleans, 6363 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.
Ronald J RyelDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-5230, USA.
Loyola University New Orleans · USUniversity of Idaho · USUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of ultraviolet (UV)-absorbing compounds (flavonoids and related phenylpropanoids) in the epidermis of higher plants reduces the penetration of solar UV radiation to underlying tissues and is a primary mechanism of acclimation to changing UV conditions resulting from ozone depletion and climate change. Previously we reported that several herbaceous plant species were capable of rapid, diurnal adjustments in epidermal UV transmittance (T UV), but how widespread this phenomenon is among plants has been unknown. In the present study, we tested the generality of this response by screening 37 species of various cultivated and wild plants growing in four locations spanning a gradient of ambient solar UV and climate (Hawaii, Utah, Idaho and Louisiana). Non-destructive measurements of adaxial T UV indicated that statistically significant midday decreases in T UV occurred in 49 % of the species tested, including both herbaceous and woody growth forms, and there was substantial interspecific variation in the magnitude of these changes. In general, plants in Louisiana exhibited larger diurnal changes in T UV than those in the other locations. Moreover, across all taxa, the magnitude of these changes was positively correlated with minimum daily air temperatures but not daily UV irradiances. Results indicate that diurnal changes in UV shielding are widespread among higher plants, vary both within and among species and tend to be greatest in herbaceous plants growing in warm environments. These findings suggest that plant species differ in their UV protection "strategies" though the functional and ecological significance of this variation in UV sunscreen protection remains unclear at present.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationUltraviolet RaysClimateClimate ChangeFlavonoidsOzonePhenolsPlant EpidermisPlantsPropanolsSpecies SpecificitySunlightSunscreening AgentsTemperatureUnited States1-phenylpropanolFlavonoidsOzonePhenolsPropanolsSunscreening AgentsAcclimationDiurnal changeEpidermal ultraviolet transmittanceLatitudeUltraviolet-A

Identifiers

PMID26809621
OpenAlexW2254876366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.