Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26809603›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2016

Executive Functioning in Participants Over Age of 50 with Hoarding Disorder.

Catherine R Ayers, Mary E Dozier, Julie Loebach Wetherell, Elizabeth W Twamley, Dawn M Schiehser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Object attachment as we grow older.Current opinion in psychology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Validation of a Behavioral Measure of Acquiring and Discarding in Hoarding Disorder.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine R AyersResearch Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Psychology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: cayers@ucsd.edu.
Mary E DozierResearch Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Julie Loebach WetherellPsychology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Elizabeth W TwamleyCenter of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Dawn M SchiehserResearch Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Psychology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
VA San Diego Healthcare System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure Therapy for Veterans with Hoarding DisorderI01CX001149 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI AYERS, CATHERINE · 2016 to 2021
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current investigation utilized mid-life and late-life participants diagnosed with hoarding disorder (HD) to explore the relationship between executive functioning and hoarding severity.

designCorrelational analyses were used to investigate the associations between executive functioning and hoarding severity in nondemented participants. Multiple regression was used to determine if executive functioning had a unique association with HD severity when accounting for depressive symptoms.

settingParticipants were recruited from the San Diego area for HD intervention studies.

participantsParticipants were 113 nondemented adults aged 50-86 years who met DSM-5 criteria for HD. The mean age of the sample utilized in the analyses was 63.76 years (SD, 7.2; range, 51-85 years). The sample was mostly female (72%), Caucasian (81.4%), and unmarried (78%). MEASUREMENTS: Hoarding severity was assessed using the Saving Inventory-Revised and the Clutter Image Rating and depression was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Executive functioning was assessed using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST-128) and the Trail Making and Verbal Fluency subtests of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System.

resultsExecutive function (operationalized as perseveration on the WCST-128) was significantly associated with Clutter Image Ratings. In a multivariate context, executive function and depressive symptom severity were both significant predictors of variance in Clutter Image Rating.

conclusionsOur results suggest that executive function is related to severity of HD symptoms and should be considered as part of the conceptualization of HD.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFemaleHoarding DisorderHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSeverity of Illness IndexAnxietycompulsive hoardingOCDWisconsin card sorting test

Identifiers

PMID26809603
PMCPMC5612623
OpenAlexW1858411784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.