Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26809439›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

The prognostic value of mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony defined by phase analysis from gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging among patients with coronary heart disease.

Paul L Hess, Linda K Shaw, Marat Fudim, Ami E Iskandrian, Salvador Borges-Neto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic value of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: A comparative study of medical and surgical treatment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as a target for therapy in patients with left ventricular aneurysm.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Utility of diastolic dyssynchrony in the setting of cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Myocardial ischemia and previous infarction contribute to left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul L HessVA Eastern Colorado and Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA.
Linda K ShawDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Marat FudimDivision of Cardiology, Duke Department of Medicine, DUMC, Box 3929, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Ami E IskandrianDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Salvador Borges-NetoDivision of Cardiology, Duke Department of Medicine, DUMC, Box 3929, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. salvador.borgesneto@dm.duke.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony measured by gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and its relationship to electrical dyssynchrony measured by QRS duration are incompletely understood. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the independent and incremental prognostic value of dyssynchrony in yet the largest group of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND

resultsPatients presenting for GSPECT- MPI between July 1993 and May 1999 in normal sinus rhythm were identified from the Duke Nuclear Cardiology Databank and the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (N = 1244). After a median of 4.2 years, 336 deaths occurred. At 8 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of death were 34.0% among patients with a phase bandwidth <100° and 56.8% among those with a bandwidth ≥100°. After adjustment for standard clinical variables, QRS dyssynchrony was independently associated with death (Hazard Ratio (HR), per 10°: 1.092, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.048,1.139, P < .0001). Phase bandwidth was similarly associated with death after clinical adjustment (HR per 10°: 1.056, 95% CI 1.041,1.072, P < .0001). In clinically adjusted models examining QRS duration in addition to phase bandwidth, phase bandwidth had a stronger association with mortality. After accounting for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), neither QRS duration nor phase bandwidth were statistically significant. Among patients with EF >35%, QRS duration and phase bandwidth together provided value above that provided by LVEF alone (P = 0.0181). When examining cardiovascular death, results were consistent with all-cause death.

conclusionsAmong patients with CAD, mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony measured by GSPECT MPI has a stronger relationship with outcomes than electrical dyssynchrony measured by QRS duration. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and LVEF, neither mechanical nor electrical dyssynchrony is independently associated with all-cause death or cardiac death. Among patients with EF >35%, mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony together provided prognostic value above that afforded by LVEF.

Indexed as

AgedCardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted TomographyComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleGated Blood-Pool ImagingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingNorth CarolinaPrevalencePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSensitivity and Specificitydyssynchronyejection fractionmyocardial perfusion imagingoutcomephase analysisSingle-photon emission computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.