Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26809247›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Randomized, controlled, two-arm, interventional, multicenter study on risk-adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple-trauma patients.

Dieter Rixen, Eva Steinhausen, Stefan Sauerland, Rolf Lefering, Marc G Maegele, Bertil Bouillon, Guido Grass, Edmund A M Neugebauer, and members of the Damage Control Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Developments in the understanding of staging a "major fracture" in polytrauma: results from an initiative by the polytrauma section of ESTES.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strategies for the treatment of femoral fractures in severely injured patients: trends in over two decades from the TraumaRegister DGUEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Are large fracture trials really possible? What we have learned from the randomized controlled damage control study?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Innate immune responses to trauma.Nature immunology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dieter RixenDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Duisburg, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249, Duisburg, Germany. dieter.rixen@t-online.de.
Eva SteinhausenDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Duisburg, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249, Duisburg, Germany.
Stefan SauerlandInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten-Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Rolf LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten-Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Marc G MaegeleWitten-Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany.
Bertil BouillonWitten-Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany.
Guido GrassOffice of the Ethics Committee, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Edmund A M NeugebauerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten-Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
and members of the Damage Control Study Group
Witten/Herdecke University · DEBG Klinikum Duisburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong bone fractures, particularly of the femur, are common in multiple-trauma patients, but their optimal management has not yet been determined. Although a trend exists toward the concept of "damage control orthopedics" (DCO), current literature is inconclusive. Thus, a need exists for a more specific controlled clinical study. The primary objective of this study was to clarify whether a risk-adapted procedure for treating femoral fractures, as opposed to an early definitive treatment strategy, leads to an improved outcome (morbidity and mortality). METHODS/

designThe study was designed as a randomized controlled multicenter study. Multiple-trauma patients with femur shaft fractures and a calculated probability of death of 20 to 60 % were randomized to either temporary fracture fixation with external fixation and defined secondary definitive treatment (DCO) or primary reamed nailing (early total care). The primary objective was to reduce the extent of organ failure as measured by the maximum sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score.

resultsThirty-four patients were randomized to two groups of 17 patients each. Both groups were comparable regarding sex, age, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale, prothrombin time, base excess, calculated probability of death, and other physiologic variables. The maximum SOFA score was comparable (nonsignificant) between the groups. Regarding the secondary endpoints, the patients with external fixation required a significantly longer ventilation period (p = 0.049) and stayed on the intensive care significantly longer (p = 0.037), whereas the in-hospital length of stay was balanced for both groups. Unfortunately, the study had to be terminated prior to reaching the anticipated sample size because of unexpected low patient recruitment.

conclusionsThus, the results of this randomized study reflect the ambivalence in the literature. No advantage of the damage control concept could be detected in the treatment of femur fractures in multiple-trauma patients. The necessity for scientific evaluation of this clinically relevant question remains.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN10321620 Date assigned: 9 February 2007.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedFemoral FracturesHumansMiddle AgedMultiple TraumaOrgan Dysfunction ScoresProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26809247
PMCPMC4727266
OpenAlexW2265345637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.