Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26808971›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2016

Measurement of Heart Rate Variability to Assess Pain in Sedated Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Céline Broucqsault-Dédrie, Julien De Jonckheere, Mathieu Jeanne, Saad Nseir

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05313789 (Analgesia Nociception Index for Pain Monitoring in Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05313789 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Analgesia Nociception Index for Pain Monitoring in Intensive Care Units

TypeobservationalSponsorİstanbul Yeni Yüzyıl ÜniversitesiRan2022 to 2022Enrolled180ConditionsStress Related Disorder, Pain, Intensive Care Unit SyndromeArmsAnalgesia Nociception Index (ANI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Palliative medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Pain Assessment in Intensive Care Unit: A Forgotten Entity or a Quality Indicator?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Céline Broucqsault-DédrieIntensive Care Unit, Hôpital Victor Provo, 35 rue de Barbieux - CS 60359 - 59056 Roubaix Cedex, France.
Julien De JonckheereCHU Lille, Clinical Investigation Center - Innovative Technologies, INSERM CIC-IT 1403, F-59000 Lille, France.
Mathieu JeanneCHU Lille, Clinical Investigation Center - Innovative Technologies, INSERM CIC-IT 1403, F-59000 Lille, France.
Saad NseirCHU Lille, Critical Care Center, F-59000 Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe analgesia nociception index (ANI) assesses the relative parasympathetic tone as a surrogate for antinociception/nociception balance in sedated patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain in deeply sedated critically ill patients.

methodsThis prospective observational study was performed in two medical ICUs. All patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and deep sedation were eligible. In all patients, heart rate and ANI were continuously recorded using the Physiodoloris® device during 5 minutes at rest (T1), during a painful stimulus (T2), and during 5 minutes after the end of the painful stimulus (T3). The chosen painful stimulus was patient turning for washstand. Pain was evaluated at T2, using the behavioral pain scale (BPS). The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain. Secondary objectives included the impact of norepinephrine on the effectiveness of ANI in detecting pain, and the correlation between ANI and BPS.

resultsForty-one patients were included. ANI was significantly lower at T2 (Med (IQR) 69(55-78)) compared with T1 (85(67-96), p<0.0001), or T3 (81(63-89), p<0.0001). Similar results were found in the subgroups of patients with (n = 21) or without (n = 20) norepinephrine. ANI values were significantly higher in patients with norepinephrine compared with those without norepinephrine at T1, and T2. No significant correlation was found between ANI and BPS at T2.

conclusionsANI is effective in detecting pain in deeply sedated critically ill patients, including those patients treated with norepinephrine. No significant correlation was found between ANI and BPS.

Indexed as

Heart RateAdultAgedAnalgesiaCritical IllnessFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrinePain MeasurementProspective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID26808971
PMCPMC4726693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.