Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26808874›Full record

ReviewHealth physics2016

Is Ionizing Radiation Harmful at any Exposure? An Echo That Continues to Vibrate.

Edouard I Azzam, Nicholas W Colangelo, Jason D Domogauer, Neha Sharma, Sonia M de Toledo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Selenium-Containing Compounds in Breast Cancer Therapy.Biological trace element research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The Future of Radioactive Medicine.Radiation research · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Enzymatic Responses to Low-Intensity Radiation of Tritium.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of low-dose radiation on adaptive response in colon cancer stem cells.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edouard I Azzam*Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07103.
Nicholas W Colangelo
Jason D Domogauer
Neha Sharma
Sonia M de Toledo

Funding

THE FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF BYSTANDER RESPONSESP01CA049062 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HEI, TOM K. · 1990 to 2014
$21.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA049062NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health risks to humans and non-human biota exposed to low dose ionizing radiation remain ambiguous and are the subject of intense debate. The need to establish risk assessment standards based on the mechanisms underlying low-level radiation exposure has been recognized by regulatory agencies as critical to adequately protect people and to make the most effective use of national resources. Here, the authors briefly review evidence showing that the molecular and biochemical changes induced by low doses of radiation differ from those induced by high doses. In particular, an array of redundant and inter-related mechanisms act in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes to restore DNA integrity following exposures to relatively low doses of sparsely ionizing radiation. Furthermore, the radiation-induced protective mechanisms often overcompensate and minimize the mutagenic potential of the byproducts of normal oxidative metabolism. In contrast to adaptive protection observed at low doses of sparsely ionizing radiation, there is evidence that even a single nuclear traversal by a densely ionizing particle track can trigger harmful effects that spread beyond the traversed cell and induce damaging effects in the nearby bystander cells. In vivo studies examining whether exposure to low dose radiation at younger age modulates the latency of expression of age-related diseases such as cancer, together with studies on the role of genetic susceptibility, will further illuminate the magnitude of risk of exposure to low dose radiation.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAnimalsDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, RadiationEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, BiologicalOxidative StressRadiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26808874
PMCPMC4729313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.