SynthesisPloS one2016
Child-Report Measures of Occupational Performance: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obstetric triage systems: a systematic review of measurement properties (Clinimetric).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of General Mental Health and Wellbeing in Adolescent Mental Health.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Pooled it
- Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires on health-related quality of life and functional health status in dysphonia: a systematic review using the COSMIN taxonomy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Pooled it
- Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.Dysphagia · 2019Pooled it
- Psychometric Characteristics of Non-instrumental Swallowing and Feeding Assessments in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN.Dysphagia · 2018Pooled it
- Evaluating the psychometric quality of school connectedness measures: A systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Comparison of psychometric properties between usual-week and past-week self-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017Pooled it
- Examining the relationship between self-reported physical literacy and performance-based motor skills in school-aged children.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2026Article
- Occupational Therapy Assessment Tools for Children and Adolescents in Iran: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Assessing physical literacy with school-aged children in occupational therapy practice: An exploratory qualitative study.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
- Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students' Clinical Competency Questionnaire.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2023Article
- Psychometric properties of clinical competency assessment instruments for psychiatric nurses: A systematic review of literature.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
- Convergent validity and reliability of a novel repeated agility protocol in junior rugby league players.F1000Research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImproving occupational performance is a key service of occupational therapists and client-centred approach to care is central to clinical practice. As such it is important to comprehensively evaluate the quality of psychometric properties reported across measures of occupational performance; in order to guide assessment and treatment planning.
objectiveTo systematically review the literature on the psychometric properties of child-report measures of occupational performance for children ages 2-18 years.
methodsA systematic search of the following six electronic databases was conducted: CINAHL; PsycINFO; EMBASE; PubMed; the Health and Psychosocial Instruments (HAPI) database; and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was evaluated against the COSMIN taxonomy of measurement properties and the overall quality of psychometric properties was evaluated using pre-set psychometric criteria.
resultsFifteen articles and one manual were reviewed to assess the psychometric properties of the six measures-the PEGS, MMD, CAPE, PAC, COSA, and OSA- which met the inclusion criteria. Most of the measures had conducted good quality studies to evaluate the psychometric properties of measures (PEGS, CAPE, PAC, OSA); however, the quality of the studies for two of these measures was relatively weak (MMD, COSA). When integrating the quality of the psychometric properties of the measures with the quality of the studies, the PAC stood out as having superior psychometric qualities.
conclusionsThe overall quality of the psychometric properties of most measures was limited. There is a need for continuing research into the psychometric properties of child-report measures of occupational performance, and to revise and improve the psychometric properties of existing measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.