ReviewPLoS medicine2016
"Real-Time" Monitoring of Under-Five Mortality: A Vision Tempered by Reality.
Review in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- An evaluation of truncated birth histories for the rapid measurement of fertility and child survival.Population health metrics · 2023Article
- Comparing two data collection methods to track vital events in maternal and child health via community health workers in rural Nepal.Population health metrics · 2022Article
- Testing survey-based methods for rapid monitoring of child mortality, with implications for summary birth history data.PloS one · 2017Article
- "Real-Time" Monitoring of Under-Five Mortality: Lessons for Strengthened Vital Statistics Systems.PLoS medicine · 2016Review
- Understanding Misclassification between Neonatal Deaths and Stillbirths: Empirical Evidence from Malawi.PloS one · 2016Article
- Can Community Health Workers Report Accurately on Births and Deaths? Results of Field Assessments in Ethiopia, Malawi and Mali.PloS one · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.