Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26808319›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Meta-Analyses of Microarray Datasets Identifies ANO1 and FADD as Prognostic Markers of Head and Neck Cancer.

Ram Bhupal Reddy, Anupama Rajan Bhat, Bonney Lee James, Sindhu Valiyaveedan Govindan, Rohit Mathew, D R Ravindra, Naveen Hedne, Jeyaram Illiayaraja, Vikram Kekatpure, Samanta S Khora and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Role of ANO1 in tumors and tumor immunity.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multifaced roles of PLAC8 in cancer.Biomarker research · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ion Channel Dysregulation in Head and Neck Cancers: Perspectives for Clinical Application.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  16. The Prognostic Value and Mechanisms of TMEM16A in Human Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cancers · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ram Bhupal ReddyIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program, Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Anupama Rajan BhatStrand Life Sciences, Kirloskar Business Park, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Bonney Lee JamesIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program, Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sindhu Valiyaveedan GovindanHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Rohit MathewIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program, Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
D R RavindraIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program, Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Naveen HedneHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jeyaram IlliayarajaDepartment of Clinical Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vikram KekatpureHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Samanta S KhoraDivision of Medical Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Wesley HicksDepartment of Head and Neck/Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Pramila TataStrand Life Sciences, Kirloskar Business Park, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Moni A KuriakoseIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program, Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Amritha SureshIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program, Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre · INNarayana Health · INStrand Life Sciences (India) · INRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) transcriptome has been profiled extensively, nevertheless, identifying biomarkers that are clinically relevant and thereby with translational benefit, has been a major challenge. The objective of this study was to use a meta-analysis based approach to catalog candidate biomarkers with high potential for clinical application in HNSCC. Data from publically available microarray series (N = 20) profiled using Agilent (4X44K G4112F) and Affymetrix (HGU133A, U133A_2, U133Plus 2) platforms was downloaded and analyzed in a platform/chip-specific manner (GeneSpring software v12.5, Agilent, USA). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis was carried out iteratively for segregating outliers; 140 normal and 277 tumor samples from 15 series were included in the final analysis. The analyses identified 181 differentially expressed, concordant and statistically significant genes; STRING analysis revealed interactions between 122 of them, with two major gene clusters connected by multiple nodes (MYC, FOS and HSPA4). Validation in the HNSCC-specific database (N = 528) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified a panel (ECT2, ANO1, TP63, FADD, EXT1, NCBP2) that was altered in 30% of the samples. Validation in treatment naïve (Group I; N = 12) and post treatment (Group II; N = 12) patients identified 8 genes significantly associated with the disease (Area under curve>0.6). Correlation with recurrence/re-recurrence showed ANO1 had highest efficacy (sensitivity: 0.8, specificity: 0.6) to predict failure in Group I. UBE2V2, PLAC8, FADD and TTK showed high sensitivity (1.00) in Group I while UBE2V2 and CRYM were highly sensitive (>0.8) in predicting re-recurrence in Group II. Further, TCGA analysis showed that ANO1 and FADD, located at 11q13, were co-expressed at transcript level and significantly associated with overall and disease-free survival (p<0.05). The meta-analysis approach adopted in this study has identified candidate markers correlated with disease outcome in HNSCC; further validation in a larger cohort of patients will establish their clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorChloride ChannelsFas-Associated Death Domain ProteinHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm ProteinsAnoctamin-1Humansmu-CrystallinsPrognosisANO1 protein, humanAnoctamin-1Biomarkers, TumorChloride ChannelsCRYM protein, humanFADD protein, humanFas-Associated Death Domain Proteinmu-CrystallinsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26808319
PMCPMC4726811
OpenAlexW2259438076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.