ReviewBMJ clinical evidence2016
Sickle cell disease.
Review in BMJ clinical evidence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of corticosteroids in patients with sickle cell disease and acute complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Haematologica · 2022Pooled it
- Manifestations of HbSE sickle cell disease: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of sickle cell anaemia on reproductive health: a narrative review.Reproductive health · 2025Review
- Hydroxyurea - Pragmatic Reduction In Mortality and Economic burden (H-PRIME): A 2x2x2 factorial randomised open-label trial investigating practical approaches to the treatment of sickle cell disease at four sites in Eastern Uganda.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
- Impact of vitamin B12 on the reproductive health of women with sickle cell disease: a narrative review.Reproduction & fertility · 2023Article
- Genotypic and Phenotypic Composition of Sickle Cell Disease in the Arab Population - A Systematic Review.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Protocol for "Genetic composition of sickle cell disease in the Arab population: A systematic review".Health science reports · 2022Article
- Routine Screening for Sickle Cell Disease during Pregnancy: Epidemiological and Haemoglobin Profile in Congo.Journal of neonatal biology · 2022Article
- Neonatal Screening for Sickle Cell Disease in Congo.Anemia · 2022Article
- [Digestives diseases associated to sickle cell anemia in Lubumbashi: epidemiological and clinical aspects].The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSickle cell disease causes chronic haemolytic anaemia, dactylitis, and painful acute crises. It also increases the risk of stroke, organ damage, bacterial infections, and complications of blood transfusion. In sub-Saharan Africa, up to one third of adults are carriers of the defective sickle cell gene, and 1% to 2% of babies are born with the disease. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of pharmaceutical interventions to prevent sickle cell crisis and other acute complications in people with sickle cell disease? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to January 2015 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).
resultsAt this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 369 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 136 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 99 studies and the further review of 37 full publications. Of the 37 full articles evaluated, three already included systematic reviews were updated, two systematic reviews, two RCTs, and one subsequent RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 12 PICO combinations.
conclusionsIn this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for five interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis in children aged under 5 years, antibiotic prophylaxis in children aged 5 years or older, hydroxyurea, malaria chemoprophylaxis, and pneumococcal vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26808098PMC4725622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.