Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26808006›Full record

ArticleFuture medicinal chemistry2016

Inhibition of bacterial and fungal pathogens by the orphaned drug auranofin.

Beth Burgwyn Fuchs, Rajmohan RajaMuthiah, Ana Carolina Remondi Souza, Soraya Eatemadpour, Rodnei Dennis Rossoni, Daniel Assis Santos, Juliana C Junqueira, Louis B Rice, Eleftherios Mylonakis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future medicinal chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cascading damage toProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Drug Discovery and Repurposing forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Drug Repurposing: An Emerging Strategy inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Identification of Promising Antifungal Drugs againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Beth Burgwyn FuchsRhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School & Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Rajmohan RajaMuthiahRhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School & Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Ana Carolina Remondi SouzaEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Soraya EatemadpourRhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School & Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Rodnei Dennis RossoniDepartment of Biosciences & Oral Diagnosis, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP 12245000, Brazil.
Daniel Assis SantosDepartment of Microbiology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Juliana C JunqueiraDepartment of Biosciences & Oral Diagnosis, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP 12245000, Brazil.
Louis B RiceRhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School & Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Eleftherios MylonakisRhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School & Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Brown University · USRhode Island Hospital · USUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe identified auranofin as an antimicrobial compound utilizing a high-throughput screen using a Caenorhabditis elegans-Staphylococcus aureus infection model. Results/methodology: Treatment of infected nematodes with auranofin resulted in a prolonged survival rate of 95%, reached with 0.78 μg/ml. Further investigation of the antimicrobial activity of auranofin found inhibition against S. aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Importantly, the fungal pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans was also effectively inhibited with an MIC at 0.5 μg/ml. Auranofin appears to target the thioredoxin system.

conclusionThis work provides extensive additional data on the antibacterial effects of auranofin that includes both reference and clinical isolates and reports a novel inhibition of fungal pathogens by this compound.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAuranofinBacteriaCaenorhabditis elegansCryptococcusEnterococcusFungiMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusThioredoxinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAuranofinThioredoxinsantimicrobialauranofinBucillus subtilisCandida albicansCryptococcus neoformansEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID26808006
PMCPMC4976847
OpenAlexW2261930170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.