Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26807850›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Visual Cross-Modal Re-Organization in Children with Cochlear Implants.

Julia Campbell, Anu Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Dynamic functional connectivity following cochlear implantation: Predicting speech outcomes and exploring brain network dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Cross-modal functional plasticity after cochlear implantation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia CampbellBrain and Behavior Laboratory, University of Colorado at Boulder, 409 UCB, 2501 Kittredge Loop Road, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, United States of America.
Anu SharmaBrain and Behavior Laboratory, University of Colorado at Boulder, 409 UCB, 2501 Kittredge Loop Road, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, United States of America.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Cross-modal re-organization in children with cochlear implantsF31DC011970 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI CAMPBELL, JULIA DEE · 2012 to 2014
$99k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC011970NIDCD NIH HHS F31DC011970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual cross-modal re-organization is a neurophysiological process that occurs in deafness. The intact sensory modality of vision recruits cortical areas from the deprived sensory modality of audition. Such compensatory plasticity is documented in deaf adults and animals, and is related to deficits in speech perception performance in cochlear-implanted adults. However, it is unclear whether visual cross-modal re-organization takes place in cochlear-implanted children and whether it may be a source of variability contributing to speech and language outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine if visual cross-modal re-organization occurs in cochlear-implanted children, and whether it is related to deficits in speech perception performance.

methodsVisual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded via high-density EEG in 41 normal hearing children and 14 cochlear-implanted children, aged 5-15 years, in response to apparent motion and form change. Comparisons of VEP amplitude and latency, as well as source localization results, were conducted between the groups in order to view evidence of visual cross-modal re-organization. Finally, speech perception in background noise performance was correlated to the visual response in the implanted children.

resultsDistinct VEP morphological patterns were observed in both the normal hearing and cochlear-implanted children. However, the cochlear-implanted children demonstrated larger VEP amplitudes and earlier latency, concurrent with activation of right temporal cortex including auditory regions, suggestive of visual cross-modal re-organization. The VEP N1 latency was negatively related to speech perception in background noise for children with cochlear implants.

conclusionOur results are among the first to describe cross modal re-organization of auditory cortex by the visual modality in deaf children fitted with cochlear implants. Our findings suggest that, as a group, children with cochlear implants show evidence of visual cross-modal recruitment, which may be a contributing source of variability in speech perception outcomes with their implant.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAuditory CortexChildChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantationDeafnessEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleNeuronal PlasticityPhotic StimulationSpeech PerceptionVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID26807850
PMCPMC4726603
OpenAlexW2263278729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.