Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26807336›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2015

Neural correlates of different self domains.

Helder F Araujo, Jonas Kaplan, Hanna Damasio, Antonio Damasio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic subcortical modulators of human default mode network function.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  9. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Sense of self in mind and body: an eLORETA-EEG study.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helder F AraujoBrain and Creativity Institute University of Southern California Los Angeles California; Neuroscience Graduate Program University of Southern California Los Angeles California; Graduate Program in Areas of Basic and Applied Biology University of Oporto Oporto Portugal.
Jonas KaplanBrain and Creativity Institute University of Southern California Los Angeles California.
Hanna DamasioBrain and Creativity Institute University of Southern California Los Angeles California.
Antonio DamasioBrain and Creativity Institute University of Southern California Los Angeles California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe neural substrates of states devoted to processing self-related information ("self-related states") remain not fully elucidated. Besides the complexity of the problem, there is evidence suggesting that self-related states vary according to the information domain being considered. Here, we investigated brain correlates for self-related states concerning historical aspects of one's life (autobiographical self), and one's ongoing body status (core self). We focused on memory-related regions, body-related regions, CMSs (cortical midline structures), and ICs (insular cortices).

methodsThis was a block-design fMRI study contrasting brain activity for core self (interoception and exteroception) and autobiographical self (personality traits and biographic facts) information domains. It involved 19 participants, who answered questions about each domain (four conditions).

resultsAll conditions appeared to engage the regions of interest. Nonetheless, autobiographical self compared with core self showed greater activity in memory-related regions (e.g., hippocampus), MPFC (medial prefrontal cortex), superior PMC (posteromedial cortex), and anterior ICs. Core self compared with autobiographical self was associated with greater activity in body-related regions (e.g., somatosensory cortices, and EBA [extrastriate body area]), superior PMC, and posterior ICs. In addition, (1) facts compared with traits showed greater activity in body-related regions, memory-related regions, MPFC, and PMC; (2) traits compared with facts were associated with greater activity in the posterior part of the anterior cingulate cortex; (3) interoception compared with exteroception was associated with greater activity in body-related regions (e.g. postcentral gyrus), memory-related regions, MPFC, inferior PMC and ICs; (4) exteroception compared with interoception showed greater activity in some body-related regions (e.g., premotor cortices and EBA) and superior PMC.

conclusionsThe results support the notion that the neural correlates of self-related states depend on the information domain. Those states seem distinguishable in terms of activity in memory-related and body-related regions, and activity in regions that have been associated with self processes (CMSs and the ICs).

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicSelf ConceptBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPerceptionPersonalityProprioceptionReaction TimeYoung AdultAutobiographical selfcore selfexteroceptioninteroceptionmemoryself

Identifiers

PMID26807336
PMCPMC4714646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.