Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26807213›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2015

What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?

H E Smith, J Wade, A J Frew

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03826953 (Allergy UK Research and Development Nurse. Developing and Evaluating the Impact of a Nurse-led Primary Care-based Allergy Clinic in NHS Lothian), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03826953 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Allergy UK Research and Development Nurse. Developing and Evaluating the Impact of a Nurse-led Primary Care-based Allergy Clinic in NHS Lothian: a Mixed Methods Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2017 to 2021Enrolled250ConditionsAllergyArmsNurse Led Allergy Clinic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H E SmithDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Room 319, Mayfield House, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH UK.
J WadeDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Room 319, Mayfield House, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH UK.
A J FrewDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of a General Practitioner with Special Interest (GPwSI) was first proposed in the 2000 National Health Service Plan, as a way of providing specialised treatment closer to the patient's home and reducing hospital waiting times. Given the patchy and inadequate provision of allergy services in the UK the introduction of GPwSIs might reduce the pressure on existing specialist services.

objectivesThis study assessed what proportion of referrals to a specialist allergy clinic could be managed in a GPwSI allergy service with a predefined range of facilities and expertise (accurate diagnosis and management of allergy; skin prick testing; provision of advice on allergen avoidance; ability to assess suitability for desensitisation).

methods100 consecutive GP referrals to a hospital allergy clinic were reviewed to determine whether patients could be seen in a community-based clinic led by a general practitioner with special interest (GPwSI) allergy. The documentation relating to each referral was independently assessed by three allergy specialists. The referrals were judged initially on the referral letter alone and then re-assessed with the benefit of information summarised in the clinic letter, to determine whether appropriate triage decisions could be made prospectively. The proportion of referrals suitable for a GPwSI was calculated and their referral characteristics identified.

results29 % referrals were judged unanimously appropriate for management by a GPwSI and an additional 30 % by 2 of the 3 reviewers. 18 % referrals were unsuitable for a GPwSI service because of the complexity of the presenting problem, patient co-morbidity or the need for specialist knowledge or facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At least a quarter, and possibly half, of allergy referrals to our hospital-based service could be dealt with in a GPwSI clinic, thereby diversifying the patient pathway, allowing specialist services to focus on more complex cases and reducing the waiting time for first appointments.

Indexed as

Adult patientsAllergyCommissioningGP with special interestReferral letter

Identifiers

PMID26807213
PMCPMC4722667
OpenAlexW2261917718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.