Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26807119›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2015

Does the intrathecal propofol have a neuroprotective effect on spinal cord ischemia?

Murat Sahin, Huriye Gullu, Kemal Peker, Ilyas Sayar, Orhan Binici, Huseyin Yildiz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Murat SahinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Amasya, Amasya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1180-2204
Huriye GulluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Mengucek Gazi Research and Training Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey.
Kemal PekerDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Erzincan, Erzincan, Turkey.
Ilyas SayarDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Erzincan, Erzincan, Turkey.
Orhan BiniciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Mengucek Gazi Research and Training Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey.
Huseyin YildizDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sutcu Imam, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Erzincan University · TRAmasya Üniversitesi · TRKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuroprotective effects of propofol have been confirmed. However, it remains unclear whether intrathecal administration of propofol exhibits neuroprotective effects on spinal cord ischemia. At 1 hour prior to spinal cord ischemia, propofol (100 and 300 µg) was intrathecally administered in rats with spinal cord ischemia. Propofol pre-treatment greatly improved rat pathological changes and neurological function deficits at 24 hours after spinal cord ischemia. These results suggest that intrathecal administration of propofol exhibits neuroprotective effects on spinal cord structural and functional damage caused by ischemia.

Indexed as

ischemianerve regenerationneural regenerationneuroprotectionparaplegiapre-treatmentpropofolspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID26807119
PMCPMC4705796
OpenAlexW2254961653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.