ArticleNeural regeneration research2015
Use of sensory substitution devices as a model system for investigating cross-modal neuroplasticity in humans.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning visual to auditory sensory substitution reveals flexibility in image to sound mapping.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Substitution of human olfaction by the trigeminal system.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Changes in sensorimotor regions of the cerebral cortex in congenital amusia: a case-control study.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Brain-Machine Interfaces to Assist the Blind.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Article
- Functional MRI of Sensory Substitution in the Blind.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2018Article
- Why Does the Cortex Reorganize after Sensory Loss?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.