Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26806629›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2016

Autoimmune synaptopathies.

Sarah J Crisp, Dimitri M Kullmann, Angela Vincent

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuropsychological Performance in Autoimmune Limbic Encephalitis: Evidence from an Immunotherapy-Naïve Cohort.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Symptomatologic pathomechanism ofEncephalitis (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Anti-Kir4.1 Antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis: Specificity and Pathogenicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah J CrispUCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square House, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Dimitri M KullmannUCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square House, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Angela VincentNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
University College London · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0200373Medical Research Council G0801316Medical Research Council G0802158Medical Research Council G116/147Medical Research Council MR/L01095X/1Wellcome Trust 095580Wellcome Trust 104033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoantibodies targeting proteins at the neuromuscular junction are known to cause several distinct myasthenic syndromes. Recently, autoantibodies targeting neurotransmitter receptors and associated proteins have also emerged as a cause of severe, but potentially treatable, diseases of the CNS. Here, we review the clinical evidence as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental evidence that autoantibodies account for myasthenic syndromes and autoimmune disorders of the CNS by disrupting the functional or structural integrity of synapses. Studying neurological and psychiatric diseases of autoimmune origin may provide new insights into the cellular and circuit mechanisms underlying a broad range of CNS disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesHumansNervous SystemSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID26806629
OpenAlexW4240153611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.