Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26804898›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Characteristics of veterans receiving buprenorphine vs. methadone for opioid use disorder nationally in the Veterans Health Administration.

Ajay Manhapra, Lantie Quinones, Robert Rosenheck

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ajay ManhapraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; VA New England Mental Illness Research and Education Center, West Haven, CT, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: ajay.manhapra@yale.edu.
Lantie QuinonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School & McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Robert RosenheckVA New England Mental Illness Research and Education Center, West Haven, CT, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Yale University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Advancing Clinical Research Training within Addiction Residency ProgramsR25DA033211 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI Patrick O'Connor, JEFFREY H. SAMET · 2012 to 2026
$4.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA033211NIDA NIH HHS R25DA033211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of buprenorphine as an alternative to methadone has dramatically shifted the landscape of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, there is limited US national level data describing thedifferences between patients who are prescribed these two OAT options.

methodsFrom veterans with OUD diagnosis who used Veterans Health Administration services in 2012, we identified 3 mutually exclusive groups: those who received (1) buprenorphine only (n=5,670); (2) methadone only (n=6,252); or (3) both buprenorphine and methadone in the same year (n=2513). We calculated the bi-varate effect size differences (risk ratios and Cohen's d) forcharacteristics that differentiated these groups. Logistic regression analysis was then used to identify factors independently differentiating the groups.

resultsTen year increment in age (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.64-0.70), urban residence (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.25-0.33), and black race (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.35-0.43) were strongly and negatively associated with odds of receiving buprenorphine compared to methadone, while medical and psychiatric comorbidities or receipt of other psychiatric medications did not demonstrate substantial differences between groups.

conclusionsDifferences between veterans receiving buprenorphine or methadone based OAT seems to be largely shaped by demographic characteristics rather than medical or psychiatric or service use characteristics. A clearer understanding of the reasons for racial differences could be helpful in assuring that black OUD patients are not denied the opportunity to receive buprenorphine if that is their preference.

Indexed as

AdultBuprenorphineComorbidityDemographyFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphineDemographicsMethadoneOpioid agonist treatmentOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID26804898
PMCPMC4767635
OpenAlexW2235825992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.